A simple question for a complex issue

quote:

---

because everyone knows the granites in the earth is warm, the zircons can only be an open system, helium is diffusing at too fast a rate, they would be losing helium as fast as nucleur decay produced it,

---

You seem to be somewhat confused. Do you realize that you just argued that the zircons may be older than the measured ages?

Sorry, everyone, but this is getting to be so funny that I just have to get involved in this as well.whatever,Polonium halos do not show that the granite is only 6000 to 12000 years old. It doesn't."We all know" nothing of the kind. We have seen new chromosomes come into being. Please, you are writing nonsense.God has not place any barriers between micro and macro evolution. None. Creationists have claimed this, but have never shown what these barriers are.There are hundreds if not thousands of transitional forms in the fossil record. They are there. They have been found. They have been studied and described.And, judging from the comments of professional geologists on this very board, you know nothing about pore porosity.Please, whatever, you are making statements that are simply false. I don't understand what you are doing. Are you deliberately lying? Or are you so ignorant of basic science that you truly cannot tell that you are making no sense whatsoever?

Indeed. And, as if to underscore your point, check out the very next post after yours.

This is really getting good. Indeed. "A Middle Eastern Bronze Age warrior tribe who believed the earth is flat wrote down that the flood happened. That's good enough reason for me to accept it." No, you do not. You interpret the Bible as evidence, and then you distort real data, make up fake data, and go into extremely painful logical contortions to force an "interpretation".

But by replying, we may encourage him to continue. D**n, but I'm beginning to enjoy his posts.