Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,925 Year: 4,182/9,624 Month: 1,053/974 Week: 12/368 Day: 12/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   God as a conceptual gap filler?
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 5 (14114)
07-25-2002 3:41 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by singularity
07-25-2002 3:32 AM


Creationists will forever be wondering what God did and what he didn't do. But for the last 25 years we've been pretty consistent about micro/macro. You can have a little chuckle about us changing on issues here and there, and how some even claimed God planted the dinosuar fossils. Whaterver the case, I feel the present creationsm stance is an excellent scenairo and I suggest it may represent the true nature of origins.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by singularity, posted 07-25-2002 3:32 AM singularity has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by wj, posted 07-25-2002 4:06 AM Tranquility Base has replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 5 (14153)
07-25-2002 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by wj
07-25-2002 4:06 AM


wj, of course lots of scientists who are Christians have a theory on what happened. However, in terms of a YEC stance with people employed to work on the problem there is only one basic stance:
Precambiran rocks due to creation week
Recent creation of distinct genomes
Recent tectonically induced global flood
Diversification via microevoltuion before and after the flood
And as far as I can tell it is far and above the standard YEC stance.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 07-25-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by wj, posted 07-25-2002 4:06 AM wj has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024