Ah, so now you're acknowledging that mutations can change structural morphometry (the only requirement, given the premises), but you're saying that they're not random. Ok. First off, I would like to ask why God felt the need to shove pigeon heads into their bodies, deform their chests, give them fuzzy feet or peacock-style tails, etc, if these things aren't random. Again, remeber: if there is *any* random mutation allowed, the eye will evolve, so *none* of these things can be based on random mutation.
Next, allow me to point out a relatively simple experiment: take a stock of E. coli that have a gene involved in the metabolism of lactose removed - for example, galactosidase. Put them in a lactose-only environment. What do we find? Sure enough, they evolve the ability to digest lactose. What do they evolve it from? Well, that depends. You can run the test a thousand times, and you won't get the same ebg (evolved beta galactosidase) to develop every time. Not only does a new galactosidase need to evolve, but also a new control region and genetic switch - and the pathway that it will occur varies. Thus, it is not directed, but is random within the constraints of the system (note that if you're saying that the "system" could not have evolved, your dispute is with abiogenesis, not evolution).
------------------
"Illuminant light,
illuminate me."