An attempt to repsond to Faiths questions in
Message 96 On junk DNA:
OK but tell me what it looks like, what it's made of.
It's the same basic stuff as normal DNA (chains of adenine, thymine, cytosine and guanine, the four bases). IIRC pure DNA's a sort of white slime, although you need a lot to be visible.
It really does absolutely nothing?
If it is really junk, than that's right, although a lot of sequences get labled as junk just because we don't know what they
do do.
But pseudogenes do, sort of fitfully as it were?
Pseudogenes are the remains of genes that once did something useful, but don't any more. If a gene is no longer needed (because it codes for an emzyne that is no longer needed, for instance, or simply got duplicated and is a spare) it may mutate into somthing that looks like a gene, but is gibberish. Definatly junk...
What are introns? I've seen them defined as "interruptions." Do they occur anywhere in the functioning DNA sequences?
Introns act a bit like the spaces in a sentence: The really useful information is in the Exons (words), but if you shoved them all together in wouldn't be very readable. They may also have some functions in replicating/checking the rest of the code, but that's a bit deep for me...
I really want to see a diagram
I hope you mean for Introns... Try this...
I'm beginning to grasp that Intelligent Design theory argues that Junk DNA is NOT junk but that its function is so far unknown because the whole science is new, and that evolutionists are the ones who regard it as junk, correct?
I think most evo's would agree that for a lot of it, the function is just unknown. I think the Human Genome Project succesfully identified the code sequences for every protien in the body. It was the other 99% that was a problem.
I await one of our resident biologists to tell me this is all completely wrong...