Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The New Pearl Harbor
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1496 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 4 of 17 (223322)
07-12-2005 7:57 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by NosyNed
07-12-2005 12:55 AM


You gotta wonder why, on 9/11, almost all of our defense assets were engaged in a wargame that, coincidentally, featured planes crashing into buildings. The obvious result of this is that, had anyone tried to call the FAA or NORAD or whoever and tried to tell them about the plot, the person on the other end would have assumed it was part of the wargame and "played along."
You gotta wonder why so many top public officials stopped flying the public airways in the time before 9/11, even gong so far as to cancel September 11 travel plans days before the event.
You gotta wonder why the "plane" that hit the Pentagon co-incidentally managed to wipe out the only section whose offices had been largely vacated due to planned renovations.
Either the terrorists were really, really lucky, or else they had some help. What I think is that Bush et al. knew it was going to happen, knew they could use to galvanize public support for a flagging administration, and made sure that nobody tried too hard to stop it. My guess is that they never intended to sacrifice 3000 people, I'm sure their projections assumed that the towers would survive and that the casualties would be limited to the passengers of the plane and those people on those floors.
If you look at the paper trail, it's impossible to come to the conclusion that they didn't have ample forwarning of a terrorist strike in the US employing airplanes as missles. So either a whole lot of people who should have been smarter than that dropped the ball, or their investigations were hampered by commands from the top to "not look too hard into this."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by NosyNed, posted 07-12-2005 12:55 AM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by CK, posted 07-12-2005 8:07 AM crashfrog has replied
 Message 12 by cmanteuf, posted 07-12-2005 11:30 AM crashfrog has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1496 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 6 of 17 (223328)
07-12-2005 8:15 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by CK
07-12-2005 8:07 AM


Sub in London Bombing for 911 and I've heard all of that word for word.
Oh, really? You guys were having nationwide wargames that featured terrorist activities the exact day of the real terrorist strikes? Really?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by CK, posted 07-12-2005 8:07 AM CK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by CK, posted 07-12-2005 8:52 AM crashfrog has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024