Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Divine Proportion: Does It Have a Materialistic Explaination?
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 7 of 49 (148350)
10-08-2004 12:01 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by JasonChin
10-08-2004 9:07 AM


Re: The Divine Proportion: Does It Have a Materialistic Explaination?
In any Honey bee colony in the world, ANY ONE, The number of female bees divided by the number of male bees = 1.618
I don't even have to look anything up. This is wrong. Totally.
There are a few 10's of thousands of bees in a hive. Most of them are workers (sterile females). There are 10's or hundreds of males.
The ratio is never Phi.
This message has been edited by NosyNed, 10-08-2004 11:02 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by JasonChin, posted 10-08-2004 9:07 AM JasonChin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Wounded King, posted 10-11-2004 10:32 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 19 of 49 (148870)
10-10-2004 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by JasonChin
10-10-2004 5:10 AM


Not us
Are you saying that the length of the human body from the navel to the toes divided by whatever it was (or vice versa) doesn't equal Phi?
I'm pretty sure he is. (btw, remember the bees)
It sure ain't all humans with my 2 brothers and I as examples. We are all very differently proportioned. (only one of us is 'golden' ).
So what is the claim. All humans, some humans, the average human, males or females?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by JasonChin, posted 10-10-2004 5:10 AM JasonChin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by JasonChin, posted 10-11-2004 11:09 PM NosyNed has replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 33 of 49 (149275)
10-11-2004 11:19 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by JasonChin
10-11-2004 11:09 PM


The onus is on you.
You made a claim about the bees. You have to show your support for your claim.
I can tell you that it is a fact that the number of workers in a normal hive is in the 10,000's.
quote:
Honeybees live in hives or colonies. A small hive contains about 20,000 bees, while some larger hives may have over 100,000 bees. Hives include one queen, hundreds of drones, and thousands of worker bees. The worker bees are female, but they do not breed. The queen bee is female and creates all the babies for the hive. The drone bees are male and do not have stingers.
from: http://www.42explore.com/bees.htm
Other sites have similar numbers. It is your job to defend your statments. Where did you get the ratio you gave?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by JasonChin, posted 10-11-2004 11:09 PM JasonChin has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 34 of 49 (149276)
10-11-2004 11:19 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by JasonChin
10-11-2004 11:15 PM


Re: The Divine Proportion: Does It Have a Materialistic Explaination?
As I just noted it is up to you to support your statments. You have not done so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by JasonChin, posted 10-11-2004 11:15 PM JasonChin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by JasonChin, posted 10-11-2004 11:22 PM NosyNed has replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 37 of 49 (149291)
10-11-2004 11:56 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by JasonChin
10-11-2004 11:22 PM


sources
Then you supply your sources and we examine how they arrived at the number. What inputs did they use and how did they do the calculations.
Sources are valuable if they are good ones. Good ones supply the details they used in comming to their conclusions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by JasonChin, posted 10-11-2004 11:22 PM JasonChin has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 41 of 49 (149305)
10-12-2004 12:31 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by JasonChin
10-12-2004 12:21 AM


Authority??
What authority? You haven't supplied any references yet. You don't have any authorities or facts or anything yet. When you supply those and we can review the calculations, statistical methods or whatever else is involved then we can comment.
You need to review the guidelines here, I think.
This message has been edited by NosyNed, 10-11-2004 11:32 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by JasonChin, posted 10-12-2004 12:21 AM JasonChin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by JasonChin, posted 10-12-2004 12:34 AM NosyNed has replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 45 of 49 (149322)
10-12-2004 12:44 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by JasonChin
10-12-2004 12:34 AM


Re: Authority??
Ah, well your impressions don't exactly count. As none of ours do.
What counts is the actual measured number of bees in hives and the measured proportions of humans. To take two examples.
Phi does occur as has been pointed out. There seem to be good geometrical reasons for it in some places. However, some of the list of places you supplied seem to be suspect at best.
It will take more than impressions to turn 100,000 workers to less than 1,000 drones into a ratio of phi.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by JasonChin, posted 10-12-2004 12:34 AM JasonChin has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024