jar writes:
I don't believe that you can take either the OT or NT as literal. And from a religious point of view, it simply does not matter if anything in the Bible is true or really happened.
To which Phatboy replies:
quote:
I suppose that you mean this statement to include the Resurrection of Jesus Christ?
Sure. Religion is a belief system. A belief system. It's not based on what is fact, but rather what we believe. If the stories in the Bible were only tales, would that have any effect on the value of the message itself?
If you look at the Nicene Creed, it begins "I believe". It does not say, these are the facts, it says, I believe.
but my point about that Parable was that it applied to the Jews and the rest of the Nations at the time of Revelation.
Well, there is the exclusionist philosophy coming in again. Why do you believe that the Jews and the rest of the Nations are somehow different?
First, was Jesus a Jew?
Second, were his disciples Jews?
Let's take a look though at Revelations, since that is the topic of this thread.
Revelations 1:
1: The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:
2: Who bare record of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, and of all things that he saw.
3: Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein: for the time is at hand.
Look at the statement, "things which must shortly come to pass", "for the time is at hand". This is talking about things that the author believe will take place in his own lifetime, not some distant future.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion