I find her style similar to Ari Fleischer, the "admit nothing, deny everything, make counter accusations" school of debate.
I particularly liked the "I've looked at the evidence presented for evolution and it makes me believe in the flood more" approach. The technical debate term I think is the "I'm rubber, you're glue" effect. Dismissal with a twist.
At the risk of being an armchair psychologist maybe this applies:
Page not found - John is Content a sample "Another(game), Why don’t youyes but, involves the interesting party game in which one person presents a problem and the rest of the group offers suggestions, all of which are turned down no matter what their value."
ABB
™ Version 4.2
