Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Crand Canyon Tracks Were Not Formed During a Worldwide Flood
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 81 of 100 (20665)
10-24-2002 1:36 AM
Reply to: Message 80 by Adminnemooseus
10-24-2002 12:36 AM


^ Very good detective work, Moose. BTW, are you the same Det. Moose that is investigating that sniper case?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Adminnemooseus, posted 10-24-2002 12:36 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 90 of 100 (20912)
10-27-2002 4:56 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by Randy
10-27-2002 12:44 PM


^ You obviously expect us to believe your hearsay on a critical point.
I have read and skipped through dozens of stratigraphy books. I would simply not be able to make the statements you are making from them. Unless I am mistaken, you have simply gained an impression about the 'canyon strata and are expounding gross simplifications.
I often do that too - but at least I'm arguing feasability there not outright ruling out a model like you are.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 10-27-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Randy, posted 10-27-2002 12:44 PM Randy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by edge, posted 10-27-2002 5:47 PM Tranquility Base has replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 92 of 100 (20915)
10-27-2002 6:44 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by edge
10-27-2002 5:47 PM


^ Correct Edge. I simply haven't studied 3D topographical maps of the Grand Canyon Paleozic to that extent!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by edge, posted 10-27-2002 5:47 PM edge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by edge, posted 10-28-2002 2:58 PM Tranquility Base has not replied
 Message 94 by Minnemooseus, posted 10-28-2002 3:47 PM Tranquility Base has replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 95 of 100 (20957)
10-28-2002 6:16 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by Minnemooseus
10-28-2002 3:47 PM


^ Exactly what I suspected.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Minnemooseus, posted 10-28-2002 3:47 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by edge, posted 10-29-2002 10:20 PM Tranquility Base has replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 97 of 100 (21059)
10-29-2002 10:28 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by edge
10-29-2002 10:20 PM


^ We're agreed that the maps are fragmentary or inaccesible or cannot be reconstructed in detail or simply don't exist. So how would you propose I continued?
The main point is I'm arguing feasabilty. I am happy with feasability. You aren't. So you rule it out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by edge, posted 10-29-2002 10:20 PM edge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by edge, posted 10-29-2002 10:32 PM Tranquility Base has not replied
 Message 99 by Randy, posted 03-02-2003 9:50 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024