Homo Erectus Palaeojavanicus and the origin of modern man

I'm afraid that opening posts needs a bit more in it.For one thing you will need refrences to information about this H. Erectus subspecies.I think I can predict the outcome of the discussion already but if you supply references I'll promote this to, what?, Human Origins?The outcome will be that there is not good support for the existance of the big guys. They are crank science. That's just my prediction but if you are willing to take this on and support it then have fun.

although my kids are either starving or eating the cat while I wait. But that's only fair since you were patient before.

See the help next to dbcodes on (on the left when you re editing) for how to format a nice link.It will save others time if you do that. I think you will need (but we'll get to that) a more primary reference than wikipedia but that is somewhere for people to start.

Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

It appears I was wrong about this being crank science.However, it also appears that there is an easy answer to the question. There was some bushiness in the Homo line even rather late on and this represents just one branch that got cut off.