Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,923 Year: 4,180/9,624 Month: 1,051/974 Week: 10/368 Day: 10/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hyper evolution in the bible
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 211 of 317 (226868)
07-27-2005 5:59 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by simple
07-27-2005 1:11 PM


Re: evidence is in!
dreams and hallucinations ≠ evidence.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by simple, posted 07-27-2005 1:11 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by simple, posted 07-27-2005 6:50 PM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 214 of 317 (226879)
07-27-2005 7:04 PM
Reply to: Message 213 by simple
07-27-2005 6:50 PM


Re: evidence is in!
the "≠ evidence" part.
you have no evidence. you don't even have the textual support of the bible. why should i just believe in some crap you made up?

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by simple, posted 07-27-2005 6:50 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by simple, posted 07-27-2005 10:23 PM arachnophilia has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 218 of 317 (226917)
07-28-2005 12:17 AM
Reply to: Message 217 by simple
07-27-2005 10:35 PM


Re: eyes wide open
OK, cowboy, keep a constant lookout for granny
if i find her, i'll give her back her speck-tacles, and make her a sandwich.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by simple, posted 07-27-2005 10:35 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 219 by simple, posted 07-28-2005 2:44 AM arachnophilia has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 231 of 317 (235764)
08-22-2005 10:21 PM
Reply to: Message 230 by simple
08-22-2005 9:46 PM


are you talking to yourself?
i mean, long-dead thread that's basically your personal soapbox for your crackpot ideas, and a newbie who bumps it asking to know more? kinda suspicious.
But from what I can so far understand in the bible, a merged world was required for the flood
prove it. arguments from incredulity don't work. period. not even with the bible. there's a lot of incredible stuff that happens, and as i've pointed out, LONG after your separation.
and Adam and Eve's garden,
prove it.
and the long lifespans, etc.
prove it. we've shown that long lifes happen in the bible after your split.
apply this logic to the rest your post. it's not even worth my time to go through it and "prove it" for every unsupported and wild assertion that just plain reaks of biblical ignorance.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 230 by simple, posted 08-22-2005 9:46 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 233 by randman, posted 08-22-2005 10:34 PM arachnophilia has replied
 Message 241 by simple, posted 08-22-2005 11:46 PM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 236 of 317 (235778)
08-22-2005 10:58 PM
Reply to: Message 233 by randman
08-22-2005 10:34 PM


Re: are you talking to yourself?
The Bible does suggest man's lifespans began to be shortened with a withdrawal of something from the Spirit of God in the earth possibly since God says "My Spirit will not always strive with man."
god then limits human lifespan to 120 years. simple, btw, is misreading this verse too.
of course, after that decree, the lifespans go on in the 200-year range. in fact, he says the "split" happened during peleg's lifetime, but the next two generations of peleg's sons STILL live longer than normal. at least one is 200+. the division of the world that verse refers to is the tower of babel, not his merged world.
You could argue that there was no change except God's decree, but it does make sense that there would be a physical or real change made as well, and that some of the life of God's Spirit would be withdrawn.
but that's not exactly what he's arguing. god is continually less and less present as biblical chronology goes on. at no point is there a SUDDEN shift in god's presence, other than possibly the exile. and god certainly does not need a merged world to act.
if we want to look at actual divisions, look at the creation event. heavne divides the water -- and is structurally separate from earth. at no point are they ever one and the same, not even in revelation.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 233 by randman, posted 08-22-2005 10:34 PM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 242 by simple, posted 08-23-2005 12:18 AM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 238 of 317 (235780)
08-22-2005 11:06 PM
Reply to: Message 232 by randman
08-22-2005 10:27 PM


Re: good overall point
The evo assumption, without a shred of evidence, is that all things have essentially remained the same, uniformatarianism.
a strawman, and a bad one. the first word of the definition of evolution is "change." the evo assumption is change.
The Bible strongly suggests in a number of places that this is incorrect, that the universe has undergone major fundamental shifts, even in what men have considered it's basic principles.
religion in general as been very conservative, and against changes itself. the bible does not indicate drastic change in physical laws or god's rules, just in the conditions of people. being kicked out of eden is a sudden change. the confusion of babel is a sudden change. the exodus is a relatively sudden change. the exile is a sudden change -- but never does god redefine the physical universe.
the closest we have is in genesis 6. god sets a limit on human lifespan, and uncreates and recreates the earth. humans are also now allowed to eat meat, too. but that's really about it.
it never says that the world was a spiritual place and now it's not. there's lots of spiritual stuff going on in the nt. simple is forced to support his idea with an ad-hoc explanation of localized spiritual intervention. it doesn't hold up.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 232 by randman, posted 08-22-2005 10:27 PM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 243 by simple, posted 08-23-2005 12:23 AM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 240 of 317 (235786)
08-22-2005 11:14 PM
Reply to: Message 239 by randman
08-22-2005 11:12 PM


Re: QR
change occurs over time. remove time as something we move through, change becomes irrelevant.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 239 by randman, posted 08-22-2005 11:12 PM randman has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 246 of 317 (235812)
08-23-2005 1:16 AM
Reply to: Message 241 by simple
08-22-2005 11:46 PM


simple math
Not really, the lifespans and fast growth, and flood events far out import anything else you could dig up. And even if you could, likely the spiritual was involved.
that's the point, simple. the spiritual continues LONG after you say it stops.
Oh have we now? Peleg was a harbinger of much shorter spans, you must know this?
not.
according.
to.
the.
bible.
http://EvC Forum: Hyper evolution in the bible
peleg lives 239 years. peleg's son lives 239 years as well. peleg's grandson lives 230 years. peleg's great grandson lives 148 years. the first person in peleg's line to come within the normal lifespan is his great, great grandson tehor, at 70 years. the span between peleg's birth and tehor's birth is 121 years (not 120, i might add). after tehor's birth, his father lives another 119 years (outliving his son by 49 years).
quote:
Gen 5:32 And Noah was five hundred years old: and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
Gen 6:3 And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also [is] flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
Gen 6:10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
Gen 7:6 And Noah [was] six hundred years old when the flood of waters was upon the earth.
there's a bit of descrepency here, of about two years. i'll be generous, and give you those two years. it seems it takes noah about 100 years to build that ark, during which shem grows up to be about 98. i'll use the 98, not 100. cause i'm nice. so, from the time of the proclamation of the limited lifespace (120 years), it's at least 98 years until the flood.
quote:
Gen 11:10 These [are] the generations of Shem: Shem [was] an hundred years old, and begat Arphaxad two years after the flood:
flood (98) + 2 = 100.
quote:
Gen 11:12 And Arphaxad lived five and thirty years, and begat Salah:
100 + 35 = 135
quote:
Gen 11:14 And Salah lived thirty years, and begat Eber:
135 + 30 = 165
quote:
Gen 11:16 And Eber lived four and thirty years, and begat Peleg:
165 + 34 = 199. your date for the split (still not 120)
quote:
Gen 11:18 And Peleg lived thirty years, and begat Reu:
199 + 30 = 229
quote:
Gen 11:20 And Reu lived two and thirty years, and begat Serug:
299 + 32 = 261
quote:
Gen 11:22 And Serug lived thirty years, and begat Nahor:
261 + 30 = 291
quote:
Gen 11:24 And Nahor lived nine and twenty years, and begat Terah:
291 + 29 = 320. so, from the flood, it's 320 before the BIRTH of the first guy with a "normal" lifespan. or, if you'd like, 390 before the first normal death. that's the MINIMUM figure. not 120. you're wrong, qed.
of course, just to fould you up even more, we all know who terah's son is, right?
quote:
Gen 25:7 And these [are] the days of the years of Abraham's life which he lived, an hundred threescore and fifteen years.
that's 145 years.
quote:
Gen 35:28 And the days of Isaac were an hundred and fourscore years.
that's 180 years.
quote:
Gen 47:28 And Jacob lived in the land of Egypt seventeen years: so the whole age of Jacob was an hundred forty and seven years.
147 years. still not normal!
quote:
Gen 50:26 So Joseph died, [being] an hundred and ten years old: and they embalmed him, and he was put in a coffin in Egypt.
hmm, getting closer. in other word, terah was a fluke. all of the people in the book of genesis seem to have longer-than-normal lifespans. hwy is peleg singled out? his next two generations live almost exactly as long as he did, and there is NO logical way to apply that 120 years verse to peleg, who was born at least 199 years after that proclamation.
so where, pray tell, are these shorter lifespans? well, there IS a pretty significant drop in lifespan from eber to peleg (-48%). but there's a -52% difference between nahor and terah. not to mention a -36% between noah and shem and a -35% difference between serug and nahor. so it's not even the most significant drop. if we remove terah as a statistical fluke, it is a pretty significant decline, but not that much out of the curve of the steady decline of genesis's patriarchal lifespans, starting at noah, which drop 350 years, skips a few generations, drops 150, skips a few, drops 200 (peleg), skips a few, drops 100, and then stays about the same.
now, you may have caught something here. quantitatively, peleg's lifespan's shortening is not even the biggest. shem's is. all the people before shem lived 950 some years. shem only lived 600.
so let's review.
  • peleg's difference in lifespan was not statistically the most significant
  • peleg's difference in lifespan was not quantitatively the biggest
  • peleg was not even born 120 years after god's "120 year" decree.
in other words, not one of your points lines up.
This message has been edited by arachnophilia, 08-23-2005 01:17 AM

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 241 by simple, posted 08-22-2005 11:46 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by simple, posted 08-23-2005 10:39 AM arachnophilia has replied
 Message 276 by simple, posted 08-29-2005 11:25 PM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 247 of 317 (235818)
08-23-2005 1:53 AM
Reply to: Message 242 by simple
08-23-2005 12:18 AM


Re: mars water explained!
"God promised them one hundred and twenty years' respite: if they repented in that interim, well; if not, they should be destroyed by a flood. See note on "Ge 6:5" " Genesis 6 - Clarke's Commentary - Bible Commentaries - StudyLight.org
"b. God also promises of man, his days will be one hundred and twenty years. This is not the outside life span of man, but this is the time left until the judgment of the flood." David Guzik's Commentary - StudyLight.org
These are the first commentaries I pulled up on the issue. You are wrong.
ahem. no. in message 219 of this very thread, you write:
quote:
So we have a set time before something happens, 120 years. Most have taken this to be the time till the flood came, hence, many say that Noah took 120 years to build the ark. Fine, this was my opinion as well. However, it seems more reasonable to take it as the time God set till the split! Peleg was born 101 years after the flood
interestingly enough, you cite the same resources. i am not arguing a strawman, i am arguing what you, yourself said: that it was 120 years from the proclamation to split. incidently, peleg was born 101 years after the flood. but at least 199 years after the proclamation. if it were 120 years from proclamation to the flood (a MUCH better reading) then it doesn't matter, and this whole 120 years to peleg thing is moot.
Well, yes, this is my attempt to pinpoint it, but the general concept is not pegged to peleg! Now, at Peleg, we do get down to 200 year plus lifespans, with a pattern of dropping from there, down to present levels.
the decline is more drawn out. there is no point of splitting.
Could this be simple genetic purity,
whoa there!
which, after the split, and radioactivity of decay, or whatnot, start to affect our genes, and a pattern comes, where they seettle down at lower levels? Or some such after effect? I mean, this is a far cry from the old near one thousand years here!
ad-hoc. show me something in the bible that has to do with radioactive decay or genetics.
But there seems to be a seperation that did happen, for a lot of reasons, and you have nothing you can say against it, but opinion.
actually, there is something i can say to it.
quote:
Jhn 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
quote:
Mat 1:23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
do you really think god has abandoned us? do you think we are separated from our god? it's times like this i really wish the book of thomas were actually in the bible:
quote:
3 Jesus said, "If your leaders say to you, 'Look, the (Father's) kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede you. Rather, the kingdom is within you and it is outside you.
But look at where He caused the devided waters to come down and flood the earth! This is another indication there was more than physical only at work, because under most scenarios now, if we plunk a half a world of water on to earth, let alone blow it off again with a great wind (?!)- we kill life on earth with heat. This didn't happen, indicating something more was at play here.
what you're basically saying is that natural explanation don't work. that's a tautology, and tautologies are logically meaningless. god is supernatural. duh.
of COURSE there's something more at play here -- it's called "god." you either believe, or you don't. trying to justify something that is inherently supernatural with a naturalistic explanation is just stupid. why do you need this merged reality? can't you just accept that "god did it" like every other creationist?
Interesting sidenote: If the great wind in a merged world, after the flood did blow off somehow much of the flood water into space, it may have ended up on mars, and some other places! If, say, space were not a cold vacuum in a merged universe, and gravity was either less, or temporarily counterbalanced with some other force, or something - then the water from the flooded planet would have gone off into spavce. A century later ( I admit this is some speculation here)as the split comes about, space is cold, the globs of water freeze into 'spacebergs'crashing into planets, causing craters! In a recent photo of mars, we see ice, right in a crater!!!!!! Oh the possible wonders of a split!
uh.
you ever thought of trying out for olympic gymnastics?
This message has been edited by arachnophilia, 08-23-2005 02:06 AM

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by simple, posted 08-23-2005 12:18 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 252 by simple, posted 08-23-2005 10:33 AM arachnophilia has replied
 Message 275 by simple, posted 08-29-2005 11:19 PM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 248 of 317 (235819)
08-23-2005 1:57 AM
Reply to: Message 243 by simple
08-23-2005 12:23 AM


howabout a big spiritual impact?
The spirits can come through to the physical, and we know they do. This is no ad hoc point. The angel troubled the water in a pool, for example, not all the water in the world, this is pretty local.
alright. here's god affecting something HUGE post "split."
quote:
Jos 10:13 And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. [Is] not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.
the sun and the moon stood still. if you wanna interpolate this into our modern understand of the solar system, the earth stopped rotating, and probably stopped revolving around the sun too. the moon halted it's orbit as well.
a flood is cake compared to stopping the motions of the heavens. and this is well after your split.
can we stop this now? are you satisfied that you're actually wrong? or do you have some other ad-hoc explanation for this you'd liek to add? that's a pretty big thing, you know. not local. not a little pool. WHOLE FREAKING PLANETS.
what is size to god?
This message has been edited by arachnophilia, 08-23-2005 01:58 AM

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by simple, posted 08-23-2005 12:23 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 251 by simple, posted 08-23-2005 10:31 AM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 255 of 317 (236271)
08-23-2005 9:02 PM
Reply to: Message 251 by simple
08-23-2005 10:31 AM


double standard
This is supposed to be news? Yes this did happen, how, we don't know.
simple!
spiritual was merged with the physical!
anything else is a double standard. listen, i don't even need to address this. it's pretty obvious that you're just making stuff up as you go along. i mean, a bunch of water indicates that a spiritual plane is merged with the physical, but stopping the motions of the heavens does not? come on, simple!
It seems to have been noticed only at the battle scene there, however, and worldwide records, as far as I know, do not record the event.
nor do they record the flood.
But God can do anything, and is not limited by few or many (even stars and suns)etc.
nor is god limited (or kept away) but your supposed split.
No, this does not rule out a coming merged universe, and eternity, and heaven, or a split.
yes, actually, it does. you're implying a change. the only change seems to be who's in charge, not whether god's around, can act, or works gigantic miracles. saying that there will be a merge in the future is implying that there is a split NOW -- the position you cannot demonstrate with the text.
I'm away from easy net access for a week or so
do you always run away from a really good point?

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 251 by simple, posted 08-23-2005 10:31 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 278 by simple, posted 08-29-2005 11:50 PM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 256 of 317 (236274)
08-23-2005 9:11 PM
Reply to: Message 253 by simple
08-23-2005 10:39 AM


Re: simple math
False, I don't have the time now to explain.
no, of course you don't. the math is pretty clear. you have been MATHEMATICALLY disproven. there is no stronger proof.
Peleg was born 101 years after the flood. I have read this, as well as looked it up in the bible, if you are right, I will be very surprised.
my math confirms that. i'm not debating it. the thing is that, as per your ORIGINAL statement that the split occured 19 years into his life, this is out of the time-frame of the 120 years. if noah took 120 years to build his ark and wait for the waters, as YOUR OWN SOURCES SAY, then peleg was born 221 years after that decree. if noah took the minimum of 98, he'd still be over the 120 mark. meaning that the 120 cannot refer to peleg, period.
if you really want to know, i suspect your source is right, and that it was 120 years from the decree of limit on man's life (ie: as a species) until the flood. that reading make sense. that means god gave that command 20-22 years before noah was born. it then took noah 98-100 years to find favor with god and then build the ark. a little out of sequence, since noah is introduced in chapter 5, but he's reintroduced in 6 and the bible is funny like that.
in other words, the "limit on man's life" of genesis 6 cannot refer to the "world divided" in genesis 11. it does not add up. period. qed.
As for lifespans, the trnd was clear, and some did live longer than others, it isn't a rigid thing here, just an emmerging pattern. As you say, his great gtreat grandson was already at our levels!
and the trend IS clear. the largest decrease statistically is terah. the largest decrease total was shem. peleg is just a member of a steadily declining line of descendants. no one special, and not a point for your split.
no one is arguing that the bible does not say people lived longer and now they don't. they're arguing that the verse in genesis 6 can't have anything to do with that, and it's not a result of a split or anything in peleg's time.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 253 by simple, posted 08-23-2005 10:39 AM simple has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 257 of 317 (236275)
08-23-2005 9:16 PM
Reply to: Message 252 by simple
08-23-2005 10:33 AM


crackpots
Because I can, because the ones on offer are absurd, because to God, even the merged universe is natural, and because I feel like it.
you know, i've read some pretty unrealistic stuff in the bible, i will agree. but let's just be clear that that's what you're knocking here. you're knocking the actual content of the bible.
god speaking it, and it being so is just not enough for you. if you're ok with that, i am too. i suspect god does operate through various mechanisms and natural law.
but of all the preposterous and UNNECCESSARY explanations i've heard for things, this "sandwich" thing is by far the worst yet. if you want my advice, study science. understand it. if you don't like that, study the bible, and understanding. if you can't pick one, do both.
but this game of reading whatever crackpot idea you want into whatever you feel like just isn't flying. it doesn't line up with anything in the real world, or even the biblical texts. to the rest of us, you just look like a nutter. at least the creationists have the balls to say they believe the bible, and that god acts supernaturally and in a sometimes decpetive and mysterious way.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 252 by simple, posted 08-23-2005 10:33 AM simple has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 281 of 317 (238694)
08-30-2005 9:20 PM
Reply to: Message 275 by simple
08-29-2005 11:19 PM


even more simple math
Peleg was born 101 years after the flood, yes, as I said. Where do you get a date from the proclamation there?
event 1: god declares that human life shall be limited to 120 years.
quote:
Gen 6:3 And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also [is] flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
event 2: noah gets in god's good graces.
quote:
Gen 6:8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.
event 3: shem is born.
quote:
Gen 6:10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
event 4: the flood. (do you need a verse for that?)
event 5: shem has a kid:
quote:
Gen 11:10 These [are] the generations of Shem: Shem [was] an hundred years old, and begat Arphaxad two years after the flood:
so. two years after the flood, when he has arphaxad, shem is 100 years old. the proclaimation is given before shem is born. therefor, it stands to reason, that the flood is at least 100 years after god sets the 120 year limit. the 100 years is confirmed here:
quote:
Gen 5:32 And Noah was five hundred years old: and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
quote:
Gen 7:6 And Noah [was] six hundred years old when the flood of waters was upon the earth.
in fact, the reading that's best is that 120 years is the time from the proclaimation to the flood -- just like your source says. therefor, it cannot have anything to do with your "split" if it happened in peleg's day. qed.
[qs]It seems to be a trend that quickly ends up at our present lifespans. No one says it was some exact thing, but name anyone after my attempt at a date for the split, who lived anywhere near the previous almost 1000 years? Even Noah, as I recall, lived somewhere in the right lifespan for post splitters![/quote]
if noah is post-split, then here's your counter-example:
quote:
Gen 9:29 And all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years: and he died.
950 years is pretty close to 1000. btw, that means he lived for 350 years after the flood:
quote:
Gen 7:6 And Noah [was] six hundred years old when the flood of waters was upon the earth.
peleg, btw, was born 101 years after the flood, lived 30 years and had a kid, then lived another 209 years.
101 + 30 + 209 = 340.
noah, post flood = 350.
NOAH OUTLIVED PELEG.
are you satisfied that your point is demolished yet?
I raise a possibilty question, and you have some supposed righteous freak! Look, if the show fits, and we see an effect, perhaps the cause is there too?? Something caused, if I am correct, radioactive decay in the universe at some point, just as, at some point, it will be different, because eternity, and heaven are coming.
it's doubly ad-hoc. you have no reason to assume that radioactive decay did not occur at some point. you want to believe this to justify a literal belief in a young earth, to justify your belief in a particular interpretation of the bible.
so not only is it ad-hoc, it's circular and self-affirming.
Of course not. But if angels and the spiritual are all one, or whatever you seem to think why did the angel take quite a while (I think it was about 3 weeks, or a month) to get through to Daniel? God is as near as a prayer.
cause god got stuck in traffic. i dunno. you're being silly.
We live in a naturalistic world, or physical only,
no. that is your BELIEF. an assumption. science only analyzes the physical, but it does not mean nothing else exists. in fact, if you claim to be saved then you believe inherently that we DO NOT live in a physical-only world.
and it is you who seek to impose this type of explanation on things, as if that is all there ever will be! There was more than the box.
hey, i'm the one arguing for miracles and god-did-it here. you're the one trying to fit everything into your pre-concieved framework. your box may be shaped like a sandwich, but it's still a box.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 275 by simple, posted 08-29-2005 11:19 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 285 by simple, posted 08-30-2005 10:55 PM arachnophilia has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 282 of 317 (238695)
08-30-2005 9:23 PM
Reply to: Message 276 by simple
08-29-2005 11:25 PM


Re: simple's math
"Gen 5:32 And Noah was five hundred years old: and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth."
"Gen 7:6 And Noah [was] six hundred years old when the flood of waters was upon the earth."
Now these verses you posted are true, of course, but say nothing of the which you desperately seek to imply! What does how old Noah was when he had some babies (unless they were triplets, they couldn't all be born the same year anyhow!) -have to do with how old he was after the flood! Nothing!
it's 100 years (or 98, depending) from the birth of shem until the flood. shem was born before the flood.
the proclamation was before shem.
also, as i pointed out above, noah outlived your beloved peleg by ten whole years.
Face it the proclamation was not in a specific year by any stretch of your imagination. If so, prove it
i just did. well, close, anyways. i gave you a timeframe for when it had to have occurred that backs the most obvious plain reading of the text -- the flood is 120 years after the proclaimation.
JUST.
LIKE.
YOUR.
OWN.
SOURCES.
SAY.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 276 by simple, posted 08-29-2005 11:25 PM simple has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024