Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Book of Matthew - Serious or Satire?
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 6 of 19 (285704)
02-10-2006 6:08 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by purpledawn
02-09-2006 3:49 PM


What would satire have looked like?
We are talking about a time before the invention of the printing press. Thus writing at that time was very different from what it is today.
Satire is usually written to amuse and entertain. Today you can achieve that by writing a book of satire, and having it published. But at the time of Matthew, that wouldn't be guaranteed to get you an audience.
My guess is that a satirist at that time would have written his satire either in the form of drama, or in the form of dramatic speeches to be performed at various places. So it would probably be written in a more dramatized form than contemporary satire.
Maybe I am mistaken in these guesses. Either way, there is a question of whether those considering Matthew to be satire are taking into account the way that satire would have been written in that period.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by purpledawn, posted 02-09-2006 3:49 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by purpledawn, posted 02-11-2006 8:06 AM nwr has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 14 of 19 (285960)
02-12-2006 12:05 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by purpledawn
02-12-2006 11:34 AM


Re: genealogies
So why would an author who is writing a serious religious biography present a messiah born of a virgin (no sexual relations) and present a genealogy of a man who is not the child's biological father, especially one going through a cursed line and include women not so chaste? All of them women with stories in the Bible, so their history was conveniently known.
Why not?
The author would have known that most of the people he was addressing would not be able to check the details. So he can present a genealogy designed to look impressive, with little concern that it would be checked. These days we have a technical term for that kind of writing. We call it a "snow job."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by purpledawn, posted 02-12-2006 11:34 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by purpledawn, posted 02-12-2006 3:44 PM nwr has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024