Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Shroud of Turin
DigitalDataL0G
Inactive Member


Message 76 of 77 (326601)
06-26-2006 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by 666_DBz
05-03-2006 9:49 PM


Re: Missed it alright Shroud of Lirey/Chambery - Turin
The problem with the Shroud is that it's in a class of its' own. At least the polarized "negatives" are. Wasn't there an early investigation concerned with the Turin Shroud image formation Why question the original microscopic evidence when a man at the very top of his field was asked to examine it and he found without a doubt that it was a fake - they weren't blood stains, but an iron compound (from a "medieval paint recipe") Maybe, just maybe, people like William Meacham instead of harping on about the fiasco of the C-14 dating of 1988 or going on about the chemicals used in the 2002 Restoration could just let it go

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by 666_DBz, posted 05-03-2006 9:49 PM 666_DBz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024