Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why Literal?
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 113 of 120 (38538)
05-01-2003 3:31 AM
Reply to: Message 112 by booboocruise
05-01-2003 3:19 AM


Re: Source
Also notice that, beginning with Gen 1:1 and going through Gen 2:3 there was a different author writing that, for in Gen 2:4 it BEGINS to refer to God as "the LORD God" and not just "God." That is found in every Bible I've ever seen. Also, the writing style is slightly different between Gen 1:1-2:3 and Gen 2:4-- for the former mentions "evening, morning, and the numbered day," while the latter mentions only the events and not the time at which they took place, and indicates a change in authors, which would also explain the slight confusion, if you're still not understanding.
No, I understand it's two authors. That's why I have an easy time explaining the discrepancies between Genesis accounts by assuming they're two different stories about the same thing. It's not unreasonable for me to assume that the writers of the Hebrew bible synthesized two similar but different genesis stories, from two separate oral traditions (brought together by a desire to have a written bible, perhaps.)
But then, I'm not constrained by the belief that the bible is to be taken literally, so I don't have to use textual gymnastics to rationalize discrepancies.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by booboocruise, posted 05-01-2003 3:19 AM booboocruise has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024