Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,918 Year: 4,175/9,624 Month: 1,046/974 Week: 5/368 Day: 5/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why Literal?
zephyr
Member (Idle past 4581 days)
Posts: 821
From: FOB Taji, Iraq
Joined: 04-22-2003


Message 65 of 120 (38229)
04-28-2003 3:30 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by David O
04-28-2003 3:21 PM


quote:
If there was any fossilization at all for evolution, I would take modern science a lot more seriously.
You have GOT to be kidding. If you haven't seen the evidence, it's because you aren't looking for it or refuse to accept it.
quote:
If the theory of Evolution was based on observable, repeatable, falsifiable evidence, it could be called a scientific theory.
So what exactly do you think is indicated when new species are observed coming into existence? And do you really think the sorting of the fossil record actually verifies the flood story? Do explain.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by David O, posted 04-28-2003 3:21 PM David O has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024