Why do you think so many creationists rally to ID and IC so much?
I dunno. Most creationists seem to have one or two pet defenses that they feel are invulnerable, and when they feel they are losing ground on one defense they switch to the other.
(Granted, from what I have seen these defenses are built on fallacy, ignorance, deception, and/or misdirection and I have yet to see a creationist argument that is truly supportive of their position as a scientific one.)
If you continue to debate (most) creationists from a rational perspective you will continue to be frustrated as they dance around claiming victory simply because they successfully made you chase your own tail trying to clarify this or that finer scientific concept in the name of intellectual honesty. If you give up they will claim victory because they got the last word in.
I'm hoping there are some creationists on here that will give me some *real* food for thought. Failing that, people who can help me expand my debate skills on the subject.