Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Problem with Legalized Abortion
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 98 of 293 (443679)
12-26-2007 12:10 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by LinearAq
12-26-2007 9:21 AM


quote:
From a certain point of view, women and men who have sex run the risk of creating a child, and they shouldn't kill someone to get out of the responsibility that results from running that risk.
So that means that someone who doesn't want a child shouldn't have sex at all, and a woman should certainly wear a chastity belt at all times in case of rape, since there isn't a birth control method in the world that prevents contraception 100%, including sterilization.
No married people who don't want any children should ever have intercourse. Not even once, not even if they are both sterilized.
All married people who don't want any more children should never have intercourse ever again, not even if they are both sterilized.
quote:
Is there some country where restricting abortions has caused the enslavement of their women?
It is not a coincidence that abortion is severely restricted or outright banned in religious patriarchal countries where women do not have much personal or political power. The urge to control women's uteruses goes hand in hand with controlling everything else about them.
If it is that way now, today, in many places, and used to be that way nearly everywhere not that long ago, what makes you think that it can't ever go back to being that way if we are not diligent in preserving our rights to bodily autonomy?
Here is a link to a map which shows the abortion rights status of various places around the globe. If you click on the "for a printable version of this poster, click here", you will be able to blow up the image to read it.
Notice the general trend; countries with the most restrictive abortion laws also have the most patriarchal societies. Religious dictatorships are common, too.
It is terribly complacent and naieve of you to think that we can't go back. I mean, didn't everyone think that there was no way that we in the US would lose the right to habeas corpus? We have lost that right, however and lots of others, thanks to the NeoCons.
It isn't a matter of "making abortion illegal on day and enslaving all the women the next". It is the slow erosion of our individual autonomy and civil rights, including reproductive rights, that we allow, step by step, out of fear. Fear of terrorists, fear of people who are different, fear of women having control of their own bodies.
That fear, if we allow ourselves to give in to it, will enable the religious Authoritarians to gain more and more power in our government.
Who would have thought it would be so easy?
Edited by nator, : No reason given.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by LinearAq, posted 12-26-2007 9:21 AM LinearAq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by LinearAq, posted 12-26-2007 4:50 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 103 of 293 (443758)
12-26-2007 5:34 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by LinearAq
12-26-2007 4:50 PM


Re: Life on the slippery slope
quote:
Well, you've won me over. Of course women should be able to do what they wish with their bodies no matter what the consequences. Prostitution should be legalized and if minors want to be prostitutes that's ok too. Their parents shouldn't have any say on that. It's their body. Who are we to tell them what to do with it?
Er, how is this an answer to what I wrote?
You said:
quote:
From a certain point of view, women and men who have sex run the risk of creating a child, and they shouldn't kill someone to get out of the responsibility that results from running that risk.
And what I wrote:
So that means that someone who doesn't want a child shouldn't have sex at all, and a woman should certainly wear a chastity belt at all times in case of rape, since there isn't a birth control method in the world that prevents contraception 100%, including sterilization.
No married people who don't want any children should ever have intercourse. Not even once, not even if they are both sterilized.
All married people who don't want any more children should never have intercourse ever again, not even if they are both sterilized.
...is simply the logical consequence of your statement above.
No contraceptive method except complete abstention is 100% sure to prevent pregnancy.
If abortion becomes illegal, complete abstention from intercourse is the only for-sure method anyone can use to avoid pregnancy, including married couples who never want to get pregnant, or who have had children and don't want any more.
If you don't like that outcome of your position, I am certainly not to blame.
quote:
Since you seem to be putting forth the idea that the restriction of reproductive rights has led to subjugation of women in these countries, perhaps you could detail the causal links for we stupid people in the peanut gallery.
It isn't a linear thing. Controlling what happens inside women's fertility has long been a big part of patriarchy, particularly the religious kind, and is a natural offshoot of what women have generally been seen as in such cultures. Historically, women were little more than breeding stock and servants; property, chattel, the spoils of war, etc. That sort of treatment of women is in evidence all throughout the Bible and the Koran.
And, surprise surprise, it is generally in countries in which women do not have access to abortion, they don't have access to contraception, either. In these cultures, women are considered to be nothing without a man, either a father, brother, or husband. Their importance is a function of whatever male she is associated with and how many sons she can produce. This general attitude has long been a part of religious patriarchy.
Is this really the first you are hearing of this?
quote:
It is terribly complacent and naieve of you to think that we can't lose our society.
Oh please. Abortion makes society better. You not being legitimized by a religious government to be able to dictate what happens inside my uterus makes society better. Freedom of choice makes society better. Women's reproductive rights and control over her own body are directly linked to women having political and social power. As they gain the former, they gain the latter.
And as they lose the former, the lose the latter.
If you don't think so, then why don't you send all of your female relatives over to Iran, or Laos, or Haiti or Oman and all the other countries which ban abortion and see how much they like being a woman there.
quote:
I mean, didn't everyone think that there was no way that we in the US would openly support pornography on television? We have lost that fight, however and lots of others, thanks to the Liberals.
Don't like what's on TV? Turn it off.
Nobody's forcing you to watch anything, or even have a TV in your house.
quote:
It isn't a matter of "making abortion legal on day and degrading all the women the next".
Huh? How does having an abortion degrade women??
quote:
It is the slow erosion of our decency and civility, including respect for human life, that we allow, step by step, out of our own lust. Lust for money, lust for sex, lust for other peoples things.
Oh, so the downfall of society is the fault of abortion rights?
Funny, I seem to recall that the vast majority of the countries on that map I linked to that were the most prosperous, peaceful, had the best gender equity and were the nicest to live in were also the ones that had legalized abortion. The ones which banned all abortion or severely restricted it tended to have a lot of war, were run by dictatorships, often radical religious ones, and in many of them women have to wear burkhas and can't walk by themselves in public, let alone drive a car or own property or be educated.
So please, Linear, try to tell me again how letting the religious moralists constantly look up my skirt to make sure I haven't had an abortion is going to make our society better, hmmm?
quote:
That lust, if we allow ourselves to give in to it, will enable indecency and irresponsibility to gain more and more power in our country.
Yes, you religious people do hate anything that carries the barest hint of pleasure, particularly if it might be sexual.
Of course, so many of your male leaders end up having meth-fueled gay sex with prostitutes, or offering to blow undercover police officers in park restrooms that I just wonder at your motivations.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by LinearAq, posted 12-26-2007 4:50 PM LinearAq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by LinearAq, posted 12-26-2007 9:28 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 152 of 293 (444069)
12-28-2007 7:06 AM
Reply to: Message 148 by bluescat48
12-27-2007 7:46 PM


religiously-based laws are not good
quote:
So suppose a law is passed confirming citizenship on a fetus, what happens if a woman miscarries? Does she get charged with manslaughter?
What about a woman who smokes or drinks or does drugs or exercises too much or has a stressful life or doesn't eat properly or lives next to a chemical plant, and her "citizen" is damaged or she miscarries?
Will she be prosecuted? After all, if a parent doesn't feed their child very well or allows them to drink or do drugs, don't we sometimes charge the parent with neglect, or even reckless endangerment? Is there going to be a special police force dedicated to investigating and monitoring suspected "bad" behavior of all potentially pregnant and pregnant women? Will we encourage or reward friends and family for reporting such behavior to the authorities on the behavior of pregnant and suspected pregnant people?
I think they have similar forces in other countries. You can read about them here, and , and here, and here.
Also, what about all those fertilized "people" that are discarded during IVF procedures?
Would IVF be banned since it "murders" citizens in cold blood?
Edited by nator, : No reason given.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by bluescat48, posted 12-27-2007 7:46 PM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 155 by bluescat48, posted 12-28-2007 9:20 AM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 235 of 293 (444228)
12-28-2007 5:19 PM
Reply to: Message 191 by tesla
12-28-2007 1:34 PM


Re: You are idealizing Lincoln
quote:
i dont see how slavery is a proper analogy for abortion, the abortion problem is the sybiotic relationship with the mpother and fetus.
It is not a symbiotic relationship, since in symbiotic relationships two organisms mutually benefit each other.
The carrier of a fetus doesn't derive any benefit from the fetus, and in fact the carrier is physically depleted by the fetus.
The more apt term you are looking for is "parasitic relationship".
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by tesla, posted 12-28-2007 1:34 PM tesla has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 236 by tesla, posted 12-28-2007 5:21 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 237 of 293 (444231)
12-28-2007 5:28 PM
Reply to: Message 205 by LinearAq
12-28-2007 2:46 PM


Re: Linear wants a conception certificate too!
quote:
How will my paying for everything change the behavior that put her in the situation in the first place.
Look, I thought this was about babies, not controlling women's sexual behavior, or was I wrong about that?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 205 by LinearAq, posted 12-28-2007 2:46 PM LinearAq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 244 by LinearAq, posted 12-29-2007 1:17 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 247 of 293 (444457)
12-29-2007 2:04 PM
Reply to: Message 244 by LinearAq
12-29-2007 1:17 PM


Re: Linear wants a conception certificate too!
quote:
I meant that if the woman is having unprotected sex and someone else pays for the medical bills, food, etc, then how is this situation prevented from repeating itself with the same players?
Lots and lots of free sexual health education for everyone, and free and easily obtained birth control for everyone are how these things are abundantly proven to be prevented.
quote:
I think if I have to pay for something I'm not responsible for then I should have some say in preventing it from happening again.
Great. Lobby your government for lots and lots of free sexual health education for everyone, and free and easily obtained birth control for everyone so each individual will be able to make better choices for themselves.
quote:
Or do you think that women who decide to have unprotected sex should just have their lives paid for by other people?
If they get pregnant, and you believe that their conceptus is a person and she therefore cannot terminate the pregnancy, then yes, you should pay for everything related to that baby.
Around half of all unwanted pregnancies happen to people using birth control. You seem to have trouble remembering that.
Anyway, I thought this was about babies, not controlling women's sexual behavior, or was I wrong about that?
quote:
If prevention of pregnancy is the real key to minimizing abortions, then how do we bring that about?
Jesus, it's only been said a hundred times in this thread already:
Lots and lots of free sexual health education for everyone, and free and easily obtained birth control for everyone are how unwanted pregnancies are abundantly proven to be prevented.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 244 by LinearAq, posted 12-29-2007 1:17 PM LinearAq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 251 by macaroniandcheese, posted 12-29-2007 2:15 PM nator has not replied
 Message 258 by LinearAq, posted 12-31-2007 8:52 AM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 256 of 293 (444469)
12-29-2007 2:26 PM
Reply to: Message 245 by LinearAq
12-29-2007 1:26 PM


quote:
I forgot that men are to blame for every problem that women have. I also forgot that every man on the planet is out to stick it to every woman on the planet. Hey, that's just the natural order of things right? I mean, we men just stick it to everything 'cause all we do is think with our sticks.
Um, MBG quite correctly pointed out a rather glaring example of blatant sexism in that Medicare/Medicaid covers of Viagra but not the Pill.
Considering the long history of patriarchy and sexism in law, culture and society in this country, how surprising is it, really, that this would be the case?
I'm terribly sorry that your delicate male sensibilities are so easily injured by being confronted by one of the many current examples of gender inequality and misogyny that remain entrenched in our culture and government.
When MBG pointed out that sexism and inequality merely exists by providing a clear-cut example, your reaction was to become completely irrational and hysterical and create a strawman of her argument.
She never said that men were to blame for every problem women have, but they are to blame for some of them.
In a sexist society, how could they not be?
quote:
How about you actually provide something to support that statement about men controlling the Medicare system to the point where they are preventing women from having the fun and frolic that men get to have.
That's not neccessary, Linear, in a sexist society. The problems that are perceived to be "men's issues" have historically been considered more important.
In a male-dominated government culture where pregnancy and chilbirth is seen as a "women's issue", and most government descisions are made by men, it is no surprise that birth control hasn't historically gotten the same sort of attention as, say, erectile dysfunction. It just isn't on their radar.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 245 by LinearAq, posted 12-29-2007 1:26 PM LinearAq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 259 by LinearAq, posted 12-31-2007 9:57 AM nator has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024