|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 4706 days) Posts: 598 From: Pocomoke City, MD Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Problem with Legalized Abortion | |||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: So that means that someone who doesn't want a child shouldn't have sex at all, and a woman should certainly wear a chastity belt at all times in case of rape, since there isn't a birth control method in the world that prevents contraception 100%, including sterilization. No married people who don't want any children should ever have intercourse. Not even once, not even if they are both sterilized. All married people who don't want any more children should never have intercourse ever again, not even if they are both sterilized.
quote: It is not a coincidence that abortion is severely restricted or outright banned in religious patriarchal countries where women do not have much personal or political power. The urge to control women's uteruses goes hand in hand with controlling everything else about them. If it is that way now, today, in many places, and used to be that way nearly everywhere not that long ago, what makes you think that it can't ever go back to being that way if we are not diligent in preserving our rights to bodily autonomy?
Here is a link to a map which shows the abortion rights status of various places around the globe. If you click on the "for a printable version of this poster, click here", you will be able to blow up the image to read it. Notice the general trend; countries with the most restrictive abortion laws also have the most patriarchal societies. Religious dictatorships are common, too. It is terribly complacent and naieve of you to think that we can't go back. I mean, didn't everyone think that there was no way that we in the US would lose the right to habeas corpus? We have lost that right, however and lots of others, thanks to the NeoCons. It isn't a matter of "making abortion illegal on day and enslaving all the women the next". It is the slow erosion of our individual autonomy and civil rights, including reproductive rights, that we allow, step by step, out of fear. Fear of terrorists, fear of people who are different, fear of women having control of their own bodies. That fear, if we allow ourselves to give in to it, will enable the religious Authoritarians to gain more and more power in our government. Who would have thought it would be so easy? Edited by nator, : No reason given. Edited by nator, : No reason given. Edited by nator, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Er, how is this an answer to what I wrote? You said:
quote: And what I wrote:
So that means that someone who doesn't want a child shouldn't have sex at all, and a woman should certainly wear a chastity belt at all times in case of rape, since there isn't a birth control method in the world that prevents contraception 100%, including sterilization. No married people who don't want any children should ever have intercourse. Not even once, not even if they are both sterilized. All married people who don't want any more children should never have intercourse ever again, not even if they are both sterilized. ...is simply the logical consequence of your statement above. No contraceptive method except complete abstention is 100% sure to prevent pregnancy. If abortion becomes illegal, complete abstention from intercourse is the only for-sure method anyone can use to avoid pregnancy, including married couples who never want to get pregnant, or who have had children and don't want any more. If you don't like that outcome of your position, I am certainly not to blame.
quote: It isn't a linear thing. Controlling what happens inside women's fertility has long been a big part of patriarchy, particularly the religious kind, and is a natural offshoot of what women have generally been seen as in such cultures. Historically, women were little more than breeding stock and servants; property, chattel, the spoils of war, etc. That sort of treatment of women is in evidence all throughout the Bible and the Koran. And, surprise surprise, it is generally in countries in which women do not have access to abortion, they don't have access to contraception, either. In these cultures, women are considered to be nothing without a man, either a father, brother, or husband. Their importance is a function of whatever male she is associated with and how many sons she can produce. This general attitude has long been a part of religious patriarchy. Is this really the first you are hearing of this?
quote: Oh please. Abortion makes society better. You not being legitimized by a religious government to be able to dictate what happens inside my uterus makes society better. Freedom of choice makes society better. Women's reproductive rights and control over her own body are directly linked to women having political and social power. As they gain the former, they gain the latter. And as they lose the former, the lose the latter. If you don't think so, then why don't you send all of your female relatives over to Iran, or Laos, or Haiti or Oman and all the other countries which ban abortion and see how much they like being a woman there.
quote: Don't like what's on TV? Turn it off. Nobody's forcing you to watch anything, or even have a TV in your house.
quote: Huh? How does having an abortion degrade women??
quote: Oh, so the downfall of society is the fault of abortion rights? Funny, I seem to recall that the vast majority of the countries on that map I linked to that were the most prosperous, peaceful, had the best gender equity and were the nicest to live in were also the ones that had legalized abortion. The ones which banned all abortion or severely restricted it tended to have a lot of war, were run by dictatorships, often radical religious ones, and in many of them women have to wear burkhas and can't walk by themselves in public, let alone drive a car or own property or be educated. So please, Linear, try to tell me again how letting the religious moralists constantly look up my skirt to make sure I haven't had an abortion is going to make our society better, hmmm?
quote: Yes, you religious people do hate anything that carries the barest hint of pleasure, particularly if it might be sexual. Of course, so many of your male leaders end up having meth-fueled gay sex with prostitutes, or offering to blow undercover police officers in park restrooms that I just wonder at your motivations. Edited by nator, : No reason given. Edited by nator, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: What about a woman who smokes or drinks or does drugs or exercises too much or has a stressful life or doesn't eat properly or lives next to a chemical plant, and her "citizen" is damaged or she miscarries? Will she be prosecuted? After all, if a parent doesn't feed their child very well or allows them to drink or do drugs, don't we sometimes charge the parent with neglect, or even reckless endangerment? Is there going to be a special police force dedicated to investigating and monitoring suspected "bad" behavior of all potentially pregnant and pregnant women? Will we encourage or reward friends and family for reporting such behavior to the authorities on the behavior of pregnant and suspected pregnant people? I think they have similar forces in other countries. You can read about them here, and , and here, and here. Also, what about all those fertilized "people" that are discarded during IVF procedures? Would IVF be banned since it "murders" citizens in cold blood? Edited by nator, : No reason given. Edited by nator, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: It is not a symbiotic relationship, since in symbiotic relationships two organisms mutually benefit each other. The carrier of a fetus doesn't derive any benefit from the fetus, and in fact the carrier is physically depleted by the fetus. The more apt term you are looking for is "parasitic relationship". Edited by nator, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Look, I thought this was about babies, not controlling women's sexual behavior, or was I wrong about that?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Lots and lots of free sexual health education for everyone, and free and easily obtained birth control for everyone are how these things are abundantly proven to be prevented.
quote: Great. Lobby your government for lots and lots of free sexual health education for everyone, and free and easily obtained birth control for everyone so each individual will be able to make better choices for themselves.
quote: If they get pregnant, and you believe that their conceptus is a person and she therefore cannot terminate the pregnancy, then yes, you should pay for everything related to that baby. Around half of all unwanted pregnancies happen to people using birth control. You seem to have trouble remembering that. Anyway, I thought this was about babies, not controlling women's sexual behavior, or was I wrong about that?
quote: Jesus, it's only been said a hundred times in this thread already: Lots and lots of free sexual health education for everyone, and free and easily obtained birth control for everyone are how unwanted pregnancies are abundantly proven to be prevented.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Um, MBG quite correctly pointed out a rather glaring example of blatant sexism in that Medicare/Medicaid covers of Viagra but not the Pill. Considering the long history of patriarchy and sexism in law, culture and society in this country, how surprising is it, really, that this would be the case? I'm terribly sorry that your delicate male sensibilities are so easily injured by being confronted by one of the many current examples of gender inequality and misogyny that remain entrenched in our culture and government. When MBG pointed out that sexism and inequality merely exists by providing a clear-cut example, your reaction was to become completely irrational and hysterical and create a strawman of her argument. She never said that men were to blame for every problem women have, but they are to blame for some of them. In a sexist society, how could they not be?
quote: That's not neccessary, Linear, in a sexist society. The problems that are perceived to be "men's issues" have historically been considered more important. In a male-dominated government culture where pregnancy and chilbirth is seen as a "women's issue", and most government descisions are made by men, it is no surprise that birth control hasn't historically gotten the same sort of attention as, say, erectile dysfunction. It just isn't on their radar.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024