Hi Rahvin,
Rahvin writes:
And the analogy doesn't claim otherwise. But if we breed a specific species of fruit fly, seperate a group from the main population, and add a selective pressure (mild amounts of a pesticide, forinstance), the seperated population will eventually develop into an organism very similar to but not identical to the original population. If we do such things for long enough, the two populations will no longer interbreed, and a true new species will have formed. We've done this in the lab, ICANT. Your strawmanning of evolution and dishonest remarks regarding analogies meant to help you understand amount to lies.
He was still a fruit fly.
Rahvin writes:
Evolution has been observed. It is a fact. The mechanism it describes has been extremely accurate in predicting what we should find int he fossil record, and no evidence has ever been shown to disprove it.
You get that fruit fly to be something other than a fruit fly then claim it is a fact.
Neither has evidence been shown to disprove God either.
Rahvin writes:
You're shifting the goalposts to a point where human lifespans dictate that we can never make an experiment to your satisfaction.
I gave you evidence for 66 million years of a foram remaining a foram.
The same 66 million years man is supposed to have evolved from what was left after the extinction event of 66 million years ago.
I am not moving the goal posts. They are right where they have always been. For evolution to be true transmutation has to have occurred many times. There is no evidence. You say there is so where is it?
Rhavin writes:
So where is the cutoff, ICANT? If it's not a new species that you want, what is it?
It makes no difference how much change there is if it is the same animal.
I will put my horses back up as my avatar. They are both full grown horses. Tell me how they could produce offspring.
God Bless,
"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
™ Version 4.2
