God vs. Science

1. The problem with this analogy is if one takes a long walk a step at a time, the trail can be traced and reproduced all the way back to the point of departure which is not the case with evolution.2. As for the auto analogy, the same applies. We know it began with the wheel to the chariot etc. Then came the Industrial Revolution and the auto. Again, every step of every make of auto has been recorded in history so as to verify all the way back to the wheel. Not so with evolution.3. Your analogies imply ID.4. Whoever is telling to you that a normal person cannot walk 1000 miles?ABE: Btw, so far as your 2nd analogy goes relative to your position on abiogenesis, perhaps the wheel can be analogous to abiogenesis. Without abiogenesis, no evolution.We don't agree on much, but your contribution to the debates is appreciated. Edited by Buzsaw, : ABE:

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

My statement applies for all practical purposes. For example the noteworthy trails such as the Oregon Trail, Louis & Clarks's expoditions and such all have been by foot and traceable. It also applies to nearly all trails we remember in out past which we have taken. For example when I lived in Wyoming as a youth we would hike or horseback miles back into the Windriver Range of the Rockies following a tree blazed trail. These trails were traceable come rain or come snow.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Imo, that's a stretch. The alleged steps of evolution progress on a trail into complexity, order and intelligence. All we're claiming is that there's not enough traceable steps to convince us that you have enough to trace it all the way back to the primodial soup. (My question to Taz was to assertain which creos were alleging that a man could not walk a thousand miles. It appeared to me as a play on his part to make fools out of creos which he tends to do at every opportunity.) My point was no wheel, no automobile as in, no abiogenesis, no evolution, no matter how you cut it. That's all I was saying. How it came about was irrevelant to my comment.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

OK Rahvin. So long as you see it all as a dead horse no use in me wasting our time beating it.I'm just one of a host of creationists including some educated physicists and biologists who regard your alleged trail as a stretch.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Applying to topic, that notion is neither Biblical, logical and perhaps in some respects not scientific. Jehovah god is not Jehovah's earth born son Jesus whom Jehovah sent to earth via the multipresent spirit of Jehovah and Jesus, nor is earth born Jesus Jehovah god the father. Presently each entity has a different location, Jehovah god sitting on the throne of Heaven and the son Jesus on the right hand of the father, Jehovah.Jesus is awaiting time (which according to Matthew 24:36 only the father; not the son knows ASV) to descend to earth at his prophesied 2nd advent to the throne of David on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.