bullshit Christian propagandist quoted in the O.P. writes:
The old man stops pacing. "Science says you have five senses you use to identify and observe the world around you. Have you ever seen Jesus?"
"No sir. I've never seen Him."
"Then tell us if you've ever heard your Jesus?"
"No, sir, I have not."
"Have you ever felt your Jesus, tasted your Jesus or smelt your Jesus? Have you ever had any sensory perception of Jesus Christ, or God for that matter?"
"No, sir, I'm afraid I haven't."
"Yet you still believe in him?"
"Yes."
"According to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science says your God doesn't exist. What do you say to that, son?"
Well, swinging back to the topic, the O.P. author thinks that the silly piece of religious propaganda he has quoted is "cool".
In the extract above, for example, we have a fictional science professor who implies that you have to be able to observe phenomena directly with the five senses in order for them to exist. So, we have a scientist who doesn't accept the existence of sub-atomic particles, the earth's core, planets identified by the wobble of their stars, and many other things known or thought by scientists to exist that we cannot see, hear, taste, touch or smell.
On top of that, this "scientist" implies that science tells as that things that it cannot identify at this point in time, like Gods, do not exist, which it certainly does not.
So, here we have an example of an apparently deliberate attempt by Christians to try and deceive people as to what science is, and how scientists attempt to understand the universe.
Ironically, the piece of rubbish in the O.P. could be regarded as evidence of a false religion trying desperately to justify itself.
Why would a true religion need to attempt to deceive naive minds in such a way?