Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   basalt layering and flood deposits
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1019 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 11 of 30 (55660)
09-16-2003 12:39 AM


quote:
Although we could not locate convincing field evidence for long periods of time, we realized we needed to be cautious. We did not want to be guilty of selecting evidence that supports a young-earth position and overlooking contrary evidence. For this reason, we asked local creationist geologists, very familiar with the geology of the area, to show us any apparent field evidence for ancient soils.
haha This made me laugh. They don't want to be accused of only looking at YEC *evidence* so they invite Creationists to lead them around. Sure, that makes perfect sense!
And then there's this one in the reference section:
quote:
26. Williams et al., An introduction to the geology of Verde Valley: a different perspective, CRSQ 36(2):86, 1999. Welded tuffs can also cool underwater without producing pillow structures.
Referencing:
quote:
Although pillow lavas clearly indicate underwater deposition, it cannot be overemphasized that lavas can be extruded subaqeously without producing pillow structures.26
I wasn't aware that tuffs EVER produced pillow structures... seeing as they are not exactly lava flows. Am I missing something?
I'm thinking their "field geology" consisted of visiting pre-selected roadside outcrops with a few observations from afar thrown in for good measure. Oh yeah, and purposely taking bad pictures.
Definitely an embarassment to good scientists - no wonder Woodmorappe uses a pen name, I'd be hesitant to put my real name on that paper, too.

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Bill Birkeland, posted 09-16-2003 12:53 PM roxrkool has replied

  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1019 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 14 of 30 (55928)
09-17-2003 1:37 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Bill Birkeland
09-16-2003 12:53 PM


Bill,
Thanks! As always, a complete answer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Bill Birkeland, posted 09-16-2003 12:53 PM Bill Birkeland has not replied

  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1019 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 16 of 30 (56050)
09-17-2003 1:18 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Randy
09-17-2003 11:52 AM


Oh lord that was an awful exercise. Bizzaro world, indeed - yikes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Randy, posted 09-17-2003 11:52 AM Randy has not replied

  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1019 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 23 of 30 (61787)
10-20-2003 2:14 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Bill Birkeland
09-18-2003 12:00 PM


Bill Birkeland:
quote:
It is totally surreal that people, for which English is their native language, were incapable of conprehending the fact that Barnett and Fisk are discussing freshwater fossils instead of marine fossils.
Oh, I suspect they knew full well what that paper was saying!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Bill Birkeland, posted 09-18-2003 12:00 PM Bill Birkeland has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by lstorer, posted 10-29-2003 12:30 PM roxrkool has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024