Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evidence for a recent flood
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 272 of 404 (642189)
11-26-2011 12:19 PM
Reply to: Message 266 by jar
11-26-2011 11:09 AM


Re: looking at the likely reagion's geography
Hi jar,
jar writes:
But then you have no evidence for either the fountains of the deep or the rate that those supposed fountains of the deep flowed.
But fountains of the deep exist today. Some on land and many many more under water.
The water does rise 55 feet in six hours at the Bay of Fundy.
Can you show me any text that states the rate of rain fall during the 40 days of rain?
jar writes:
The Fountains of the Deep as some motive force is just plain silly.
Since you can't refute that water came from the fountains of the deep you just deem it as plain silly.
jar writes:
Again, look at the geography of the areas where the Biblical Flood supposedly happened.
A single flat piece of dry land.
jar writes:
There is simply lots of land area to accumulate rainfall, and it all flows downhill.
There is a lot more land mass under water and the water does not flow downhill. It flows around, up and over the mountains.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 266 by jar, posted 11-26-2011 11:09 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 273 by jar, posted 11-26-2011 12:27 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 280 by edge, posted 11-26-2011 5:11 PM ICANT has not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 276 of 404 (642194)
11-26-2011 12:45 PM
Reply to: Message 269 by Percy
11-26-2011 12:00 PM


Re: looking at the likely reagion's geography
Hi Percy,
Percy writes:
I thought the rain and the flow from the fountains of the deep went on for only 40 days and 40 nights, and that it was another half year after that before the ark ran aground on Mount Ararat.
We do tend to do a lot of thinking and then conclude our thinking right.
But the only text we have that tells us anything about the flood of Noah says it rained for 40 days and 40 nights and the rain was stopped as was the fountains of the deep.
After 150 days the water was abated and the ark rested in the area where the mountains of Ararat existed at the time of the writing of the text, that tells us of the flood of Noah.
Percy writes:
During that half year when there was no longer constant rain nor flow from the fountains of the deep the ark could have drifted a considerable distance at the mercy of random currents and the prevailing winds.
Yes that is very possible.
But the story tells us the ark rested in the region where we find the mountains of Ararat today.
Percy writes:
The ark could have ended up anywhere, so if you believe it ended up on Mount Ararat then that's as good a place as any.
Yes, but I don't believe it ended up on Mount Ararat as that is not what the story says.
Percy writes:
But the ark isn't the topic. The topic is evidence for a geologically very recent global flood.
There is no such evidence available.
There is none to be expected as the land mass was divided after the flood of Noah took place according to the text that tells of the story of the flood of Noah.
There is evidence all over the world of the land mass being flooded and is what would be expected providing the flood of Noah took place prior to the division of the land mass to it's present configuration.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by Percy, posted 11-26-2011 12:00 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 277 by Percy, posted 11-26-2011 1:10 PM ICANT has not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 292 of 404 (642230)
11-26-2011 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 273 by jar
11-26-2011 12:27 PM


Re: looking at the likely reagion's geography
Hi jar,
jar writes:
There is no evidence for the Fountains of the deep.
But they still exist today all over the world.
My favorite is the one off the coast of Florida at Jacksonville. It has been know to exist for quite some time now. Here is an article from the New York Times.
quote:
FRESH-WATER SPRING IN THE OCEAN.
From the Jacksonville (Fla.) Times-Union.
How many people coming to Florida know
Anythin about the great fresh=water spring in
The Atlantic Ocean? People run all about the
State in search of something new and pass by
Things as old as the sun and yet as new to the
Hundreds of thousands of visitors to Florida as
Was "darkest Africa" to Stanley three years ago.
This great natural wonder covers an area of about
Two acres. Is in the Atlantic Ocean about two
Miles (east) from the shore and about ten miles
From St. Augustine, (south) The spring is defined
By the silver-gleaming white caps trying to force
Themselves over the powerful boiling spring.
The New York Times
Published: February 21, 1892
Copyright The New York Times
There are ocean springs in the Hawaii Islands that produced drinking water for the natives many years ago.
There is a huge body of water under Asia Source
Source
Depending on who you read behind there is enough water in the ocean floor and mantel to fill the oceans 5 to 10 times.
Usually the statement is that you can't get that water out of the mantel to flood the Earth.
Who says the water was in the mantel before the flood?
In what I read the water gets in the mantel by subduction. That being the case it would have gotten there when the Earth was divided after the flood.
jar writes:
Water that falls on land from rainfall OR the imaginary Fountains of the Deep will still run downhill.
Yes, rain water that falls on hills runs down hill.
What was the rate of rain fall during the 40 days of flooding?
There can only be x amount of water in the atmosphere and if the earth was covered with cloud cover for 40 days there would not be much evaporation to replace the moisture that fell to Earth. So there would be a big problem with the rain water doing much damage running down hill. You have to take into consideration at least 70% of the rain would fall in the water.
The water rising from the fountains of the deep would rise like the water at the Bay of Fundy rises 55 feet in 6 hours.
That water goes uphill not downhill.
jar writes:
The area is NOT a single flat piece of land.
What do you base that assertion on?
jar writes:
You have still not presented any evidence for either a worldwide or regional flood.
I think I have said there would be no evience of a global flood as the Earth was divided after the flood.
As far as a local flood there are all kinds of fossils that are in and on mountains which means that land mass was under water at one time.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 273 by jar, posted 11-26-2011 12:27 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 293 by Coyote, posted 11-26-2011 8:28 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 294 by jar, posted 11-26-2011 8:40 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 295 by edge, posted 11-26-2011 11:16 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 299 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-29-2011 3:58 AM ICANT has not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 297 of 404 (642455)
11-29-2011 2:29 AM
Reply to: Message 295 by edge
11-26-2011 11:16 PM


Re: looking at the likely reagion's geography
Hi edge,
edge writes:
And this spring is ejectig water into the stratosphere?
Where did you get such a stupid idea from?
edge writes:
I missed that part.
I missed it too. It doesn't happen unless the water is heated, so no it does not spout into the air it runs off as a river and flows into Lake Okeechobee, then through dug canals to Miami to supply drinking water.
Now Old Faithful in Wyoming is a different story. The water that comes out of it comes from around 14,000 feet deep as it passes over magna and is heated and goes up to 180 feet in the air.
Hydrothermal vents are found at 7,000 feet below sea level in the ocean, and old faithful in Wyoming is over 7,000 feet above sea level.
edge writes:
And the source of the fresh(?) water is where?
The Floridan aquifer.
edge writes:
And this is your 'fountain of the deep'?
Nope.
quote:
Genesis 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
The fountain's of the deep would have been under the deep that is spoken of in Genesis 1:2. That would have been somewhere under the water.
There are a lot of vents, which a freshwater spring is, under the water around the world. They are flowing a small stream today but if they were opened up, how much water could they release into the ocean?
Remember the text says the fountain's of the deep were opened up.
But you need to forget what YEC"S have said when you are talking to me. I ain't one. I don't believe all the layers of strata were laid down in the flood. So I don't believe in a catastrophe event taking place during the flood.
That is the reason I continually ask the question, what would you expect to find if the flood of Noah actually took place?
Especially since the Earth was divided after the flood of Noah.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 295 by edge, posted 11-26-2011 11:16 PM edge has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 301 by Butterflytyrant, posted 11-29-2011 8:08 AM ICANT has seen this message but not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 298 of 404 (642456)
11-29-2011 2:34 AM
Reply to: Message 296 by jar
11-27-2011 10:47 AM


Re: looking at the likely reagion's geography
Hi jar,
jar writes:
He also seems to forget that springs work because water runs downhill.
I guess you are going to tell me that the water that flows out of Old Faithful in Yellowstone Park which is over 7,000 feet above sea level and is heated by the magna is flowing downhill.
I guess you would also tell me that all the water being released from the hydrothermal vents around the world is flowing downhill also.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 296 by jar, posted 11-27-2011 10:47 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 300 by Percy, posted 11-29-2011 6:57 AM ICANT has replied
 Message 302 by jar, posted 11-29-2011 9:47 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 303 of 404 (642503)
11-29-2011 1:10 PM
Reply to: Message 300 by Percy
11-29-2011 6:57 AM


Re: looking at the likely reagion's geography
Hi Percy,
Percy writes:
This thread isn't about how ICANT thinks it all happened. It's about evidence for how it all happened.
Can I start a thread asking for the evidence to be presented of how the universe began to exist?
If no one is allowed to participate in such a thread without presenting evidence there would be two posts. Mine presenting the problem and yours promoting the thread. There is no evidence.
So when we are talking about how a flood such as the one in the Bible story of the flood of Noah there would be very little evidence.
The Bible text says the dry land was covered with water. Genesis 7:19
The Bible says the people were scattered over the face of the dry land. Genesis 11:8
The Bible says the Earth was divided after the flood. Genesis 10:25
That is the evidence of what was said about the flood of Noah. You can accept it or reject it that is your choice.
Now I believe the flood was in recent times but I am not locked into such a belief.
I do believe that it happened or it would not be recorded in the Bible from the writings of Moses.
Percy writes:
Actual events, such as "fountains of the deep" releasing water at a rate sufficient to flood the world in a mere 40 days, leave behind evidence, and evidence is what this thread is about.
What evidence would you expect to find?
I have given the example of the Bay of Fundy and how it rises 55 feet in 6 hours.
If the fountains of the deep opened up and released enough water to raise the water at such a rate what would you expect to see left behind when it receeded?
The waters began to rise in the 600th year, 2nd month and 17th day of Noah's life.
It rained for 40 days as well as the water came forth from the fountains of the deep. Twelve months and 10 days after the rain began Noah and the passengers exited the ark.
So it rained for 40 days and then had around 330 days to receed before Noah exited the ark. So the water did not rush back to where it came from but slowly receeded.
If the waters from the fountains of the deep caused the ocean to rise as does the tide at the Bay of Fundy, in the fourty days the water would rise 8,800 feet. Then if all the water that can be held in the atmosphere also came down that would have added 1 inch more of water.
The water rising the 55 feet at the Bay of Fundy in 6 hours and then receeding in 6 hours does not change the landscape as everyone here declares that the flood would have done.
So could you explain to me what evidence there would be left by a flood that the water rose for 40 days and then receeded for 330 days on all the existing dry land on the Earth?
Then add in the Earth was divided after the flood took place.
The only evidence you would find is that there was local floods in a lot of places around the world. But then there have been many floods in local areas all over the world since the time of the flood of Noah.
I can see no possibility of any evidence being left by a global flood as the Earth was divided after the flood.
Now if you guys want to really continue to discuss the flood of Noah you need to discuss it in the light of the evedence that is found in the Bible as that is the only place the account of the flood of Noah is recorded.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 300 by Percy, posted 11-29-2011 6:57 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 304 by Coragyps, posted 11-29-2011 1:24 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 305 by Taq, posted 11-29-2011 1:25 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 306 by Coragyps, posted 11-29-2011 1:29 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 307 by Percy, posted 11-29-2011 1:58 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 308 by NoNukes, posted 11-29-2011 2:06 PM ICANT has not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 309 of 404 (642519)
11-29-2011 3:08 PM
Reply to: Message 302 by jar
11-29-2011 9:47 AM


Re: looking at the likely reagion's geography
Hi jar,
jar writes:
I'd like to point out to you first that you are yet again changing the subject but that yes, even geysers and hydrothermal vents work because water flows downhill
There is enough water beneath the crust of the Earth to fill our oceans from 5 to 10 times depending on who you are reading beind.
Are you telling me all that water rained down out of the atmosphere and ran downhill to get to where it is at?
The most water that can be in our atmosphere would only put 1 inch of water on planet Earth if it all came down at once.
That water that is in the atmosphere has to go uphill from the surface of the water on planet Earth to get in the atmosphere. So water has to go uphill before it can go downhill.
jar writes:
evidence that there was a flood
There is evidence that all the land mass has been covered with water.
Fossils declare that all the land mass has been covered with water in the past.
jar writes:
and that there was a single land mass before the flood that split apart after the flood
The land masses of the Earth are moving and if you trace it back you will find that there was one body of water and one land mass in the past.
The Bible agrees and said all the water was gathered to one place leaving dry land.
Since the idea that all the land mass was in one place has only been around for 96 or so years the author of Genesis was a pretty smart guy, don't you think?
He said Pangea existed some 3500 years ago.
jar writes:
and that there were fountains of the deep and that the water flow from those fountains was many times greater than the flow from rain.
There are fountains of the deep today and I think it is safe to assume they have always existed because of the way they exist today.
jar writes:
When was the flood?
The Bible does not say. I have an opinion but so does everyone else but none of our opinions is evidence.
jar writes:
What is the evidence of the flood?
Fossils of sea creatures such as whales that were the size of busses in the Atacama Desert the driest place on the planet.
jar writes:
Where are the sites where that evidence may be examined?
You could try Chili for the whales in the desert or visit any mountain and you can find sea creature fossils.
Now as far as finding the evidence of the flood of Noah I have no idea where you will find that evidence as the Earth was divided after the flood.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 302 by jar, posted 11-29-2011 9:47 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 310 by jar, posted 11-29-2011 3:19 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 311 by Taq, posted 11-29-2011 3:21 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 312 by Percy, posted 11-29-2011 3:51 PM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 314 of 404 (642534)
11-29-2011 4:07 PM
Reply to: Message 304 by Coragyps
11-29-2011 1:24 PM


Re: looking at the likely reagion's geography
Hi Coragyps,
Coragyps writes:
Well, except for the overwhelming evidence that you have seen at this forum about eighty times. That has been carefully explained to you by degreed physicists over and over.
cavediver and Son Guku have said "We do not Know". That tells me there is no evidence. That is not to say that there are not opinions and even hypothesis's.
The same goes for what I have been discussing here.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 304 by Coragyps, posted 11-29-2011 1:24 PM Coragyps has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 316 by jar, posted 11-29-2011 4:34 PM ICANT has not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 322 of 404 (642592)
11-30-2011 12:08 AM
Reply to: Message 312 by Percy
11-29-2011 3:51 PM


Re: looking at the likely reagion's geography
Hi Percy,
Percy writes:
The question for you is, where is the evidence that this water ever left the mantle,
Who said it did?
We agree that it is there, so how and when did it get there?
An omniscient God would have provided the water for the fountains of the deep as He knew in advance that He would cause a flood to destroy all life forms that breathed the breath of life.
The water would have been available to flood the Earth.
Where did our water come from?
That is a mystery, but it is thought to have come to Earth from outer space by way of objects crashing into Earth shortly after its formation.
Thus the question how did it get into the mantle?
As jar has repeated so many times water runs downhill, and I add unless it is going uphill as from springs, artisian wells, or the fountains of the deep.
The water that was delivered to the Earth by whatever means had to migrate into the mantle. From what I understand that happens by subduction, when one plate dives beneath another plate.
Since there is enough water in the mantle to cover the Earth many times where was it before it entered the mantle?
But I have a problem with water migrating to the mantel.
As I read about oil production in the Gulf of Mexico from 30,000 feet down when the drill breaks through to where the oil is the oil will come to the top of the pipe at the drilling rig due to the pressure the oil is under.
Now if there was pools of water in the same area as the oil is in and that pool of water was released it would find the surface pretty quick.
But the main thing is there is at least 30,000 feet of materal that water can be stored in without being in the mantle.
Percy writes:
And where is the evidence that the water eventually left the surface and somehow became distributed back into the mantle?
If all the Earth's water came from outer space as put forth it had to get into the mantle at some point in Earth's history as it is there today.
Percy writes:
Water plays a key lubrication role in tectonic movements,
Are you saying the water in the mantle plays a key role in plate movement?
I was under the impression there was e lithosphere which is the outer solid part of the earth, with the asthenosphere that lubricates plate motions underneath it, then the upper mantle and lower mantle.
Percy writes:
The water content of subducting plates also plays a key role in forming rising bubbles of magma that are responsible for the formation of volcanoes when they reach the surface,
You are refering to the plume theory which cannot account for all occurrences of the type of volcanism it was devised to explain.
But I didn't know that the water in the mantle had anything to do with the plume as hypothetically it starts in the outer core, and extends upwards under the mantle raising the mantle and sometimes exiting accounting for volcanic regions separate from those of plate tectonics.
Percy writes:
so we should see a reduction of this process at depths that correspond to the period of the flood.
Why would you see a reduction in the plume's trying to get out of the outer core?
I raised one point about the water getting into the mantel and how it got there. I have a suggestion. It got there when the Earth was divided because it took a lot of water to cool the plates and especially the asthenosphere. Just a thought.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 312 by Percy, posted 11-29-2011 3:51 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 323 by Pressie, posted 11-30-2011 4:51 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 325 by Percy, posted 11-30-2011 7:55 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 326 of 404 (642635)
11-30-2011 11:04 AM
Reply to: Message 325 by Percy
11-30-2011 7:55 AM


Re: looking at the likely reagion's geography
Hi Percy,
Percy writes:
ICANT writes:
Percy writes:
The question for you is, where is the evidence that this water ever left the mantle,
Who said it did?
You did, unless you're still making things up instead of arguing from evidence. In Message 309 you said:
ICANT in Message 309 writes:
There is enough water beneath the crust of the Earth to fill our oceans from 5 to 10 times depending on who you are reading beind.
So by saying there is enough water beneath the crust of the Earth to fill our oceans 5 to 10 times you assume I am saying that water came to the surface and flooded the world in the flood of Noah and then went back into the mantle.
That is jumping to conclusion and putting words in my mouth.
I made a statement of fact according to what I read scientist have said.
I am saying the water is there now.
The question is how did that water get there?
The water that is in the mantle would be under great presure which would exceed the gravatational pull on the water, as evidenced when a drill hits a pocket of oil in the litosphere under the waters of the ocean.
My question to you was how did that water get there?
There are only so many plates that exist and one has to dive under another to cause subduction so there is only about 6 places that the water could get into the mantle but it is throughout the mantle.
The lithosphere is from 6 miles to 50 miles thick and sets on top of the asthenosphere which is up to 150 miles thick.
The asthenosphere has a lot of liquid in it.
The lithosphere has a lot of liquid in it, including trillions of barrels of oil.
I live in Florida and Google earth says my back yard is 49 feet above sea level. I can take a backhoe and dig a hole 30 foot deep in my back yard today and by tomorrow morning it will have 10 feet of water in it.
If Florida was still covered with water as it was in the past would that water that is in the lithosphere in my back yard disappear?
I think not.
That leads me to believe that the litosphere that is under water has water in it also. This is the water that would have came to the surface when the fountains of the deep were opened up. Whether it would be saline water or fresh water would be irrelavant. I can drill a hole in my back yard to around 300 feet and get saline water.
There is water in the asthenosphere as this is what is supposed to cool the plates providing lubrication to allow movement for the continents to move.
You seem to be arguing that there is no water that is available in the lithosphere that is covered by water, is that your argument?
Percy writes:
You're right, there is a great deal of water in the mantle (that's what's beneath the crust), and it is contained within the rocks. That's what we have evidence for.
Are you including the lithosphere and the asthenosphere which is at least 6 to 100 miles thick in the crust?
They do exist before you get to the mantle.
Are you saying there is no water in the lithosphere and the asthenosphere under the sea?
All of our groundwater is in the lithosphere according to what I can find. None of the charts list the amount of water in the asthenospher under our dry land. That is amazing because it has to have water in it if the mantle under it has water in it.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 325 by Percy, posted 11-30-2011 7:55 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 327 by Taq, posted 11-30-2011 11:27 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 328 by Percy, posted 11-30-2011 11:32 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 329 by edge, posted 12-02-2011 12:14 AM ICANT has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024