|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 2/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: About New Lamarckian Synthesis Theory | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3649 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
You seem to support a totally illogical situation: You now are forced by the evidence to accept that eoigenetic changes, inherited to many generations, accompanied with a lot of regulating mechanisms, loaded in specific epigenetic genome places, sudenly due to a random mutation , that leads propably evolution to different direction, are all wiped out and go astray. What does that even mean? I really don't understand what you are trying to claim.... If that is not the mechanism you are trying to evidence, then why did you cite this paper?
Edited by zi ko, : No reason given. Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
I bet you can't show why it is a mistake.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3649 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
The mistake is self evident.After a work of maybe thousant of ys, during which epigenetic changes were accumulated together with many regulatory mechanisms,sudenly by a random mutation that most propably leads to a different direction of evolution all is cancelled and so all the previous work done is going astray. That is the stupidiest thing for nature to happen.
Edited by zi ko, : No reason given. Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
sudenly by a random mutation that most propably leads to a different direction of evolution all is cancelled and so all the previous work done is going astray. That is the stupiest thing for nature to happen. It's almost as if Nature had no cognitive ability at all!Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison. If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3649 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
sudenly by a random mutation that most propably leads to a different direction of evolution all is cancelled and so all the previous work done is going astray. That is the stupiest thing for nature to happen. It's almost as if Nature had no cognitive ability at all! Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3649 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
sudenly by a random mutation that most propably leads to a different direction of evolution all is cancelled and so all the previous work done is going astray. That is the stupiest thing for nature to happen. It's almost as if Nature had no cognitive ability at all! Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
You still think empathy guides evolution, don't you? After all these years you haven't given up on it, have you?
Edited by Larni, : No reason given. Edited by Larni, : I missed some punctuation.The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
We all know that there is a continous information flow from environment to organisms and even to the genome, How is information flowing from the environment to my genome?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3649 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
How is information flowing from the environment to my genome? It is easy to know. Just read about epigenetics.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3649 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
You still think empathy guides evolution, don't you? After all these years you haven't given up on it, have you?
It isn't time for it yet. Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
How is information flowing from the environment to my genome? It is easy to know. What a total cop-out. You don't have any idea what you're talking about, do you? If it really was easy you could just tell me rather than just doing a total dodge. You have no credibility and you're just making shit up. Its really kind of sad, actually.
Just read about epigenetics. Where's the part where the information flows from the environment to my genome?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zi ko Member (Idle past 3649 days) Posts: 578 Joined: |
Where's the part where the information flows from the environment to my genome? i give you time to be able to vomit all rotten material inside you.On the opening post : I quote. As i said it is easy.Technology Review I The effects of an animal's environment during adolescence can be passed down to future offspring, according to two new studies. If applicable to humans, the research, done on rodents, suggests that the impact of both childhood education and early abuse could span generations. The findings provide support for a 200-year-old theory of evolution that has been largely dismissed: Lamarckian evolution, which states that acquired characteristics can be passed on to offspring. Edited by zi ko, : No reason given. Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member
|
Where are these two studies? Do you have a link for them? What are their findings? What is their evidence?
Is so easy yet almost 200 posts in and you haven't provided anything.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10085 Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
My conclusions are independed and maybe different from auhors conclusions. Then why are you citing the paper? If you are just going to find papers to disagree with then this discussion can not move forward. What you need to find is a paper that outlines the mechanism that is responsible for guided mutations.
They don't take into account the possibility of guided mutations. But they don't preclude it. This is their mistake.
In science, you need evidence for a mechanism before you can include it. Where is that evidence?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10085 Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
The mistake is self evident.After a work of maybe thousant of ys, during which epigenetic changes were accumulated together with many regulatory mechanisms,sudenly by a random mutation that most propably leads to a different direction of evolution all is cancelled and so all the previous work done is going astray. That is the stupidiest thing for nature to happen. It doesn't matter if you think it is stupid or not. Random mutations is what the evidence indicates, and you have not presented any evidence that would lead us to consider guided mutations.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024