|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,915 Year: 4,172/9,624 Month: 1,043/974 Week: 2/368 Day: 2/11 Hour: 1/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Question About the Universe | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
quote: The citation claimed that Population III stars were primarily binary star systems and yes smaller. HD 140283 in not rarer than population III stars. Population III stars should dominate the farthest stellar objects observed, but they do not. In fact no population III stars are present, to the surprise of astronomy.
quote: Your point is valid, but it is just speculation at this point if these stars even existed. Since finding a population III star would be one of the most significant finds in modern astronomy. Without any empirical evidence of a population III star, no one can claim that all metals except lithium were created in stars. And how old is the milky way? Another question is star birth rate verses star death rate. The last supernova observed in our galaxy was 147 years ago, yet the birth rate of stars in our galaxy is estimated to be about 1 new star a year. In a galaxy that is as old as the universe a equilibrium should now exist between star births and deaths. Just a thought. Edited by zaius137, : Removed my statements.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
quote: Avoiding population III stars altogether Just for fun. Age of the universe = 13.7 billion years Dark age of the universe = 400 million years
Until around 400 million years after the Big Bang, the Universe was a very dark place. There were no stars, and there were no galaxies. Scientists would like to unravel the story of exactly what happened after the Big Bang. The James Webb Space Telescope will pierce this veil of mystery and reveal the story of the formation of the first stars and galaxies in the Universe. Early Universe - Webb/NASA 13.7 billion years - 400 million years = 13.3 billion years (first stars) minimum age of HD140283 = 14.3 billion years - 800 million years = 13.5 billion years 13.3 billion years (first stars) is less than the minimum age of HD 140283 (13.5) billion years. HD 140283 is older than the universe. Any earlier estimates for star formation are based on dark matter. Dark matter is a ad-hoc concoction to balance the equation of state for BB.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
quote: You are correct... I am sorry my friend, I mixed up that date. The actual date was: The last directly observed supernova in the Milky Way was Kepler's Star of 1604 (SN 1604) Supernova - Wikipedia 410 years ago I stand corrected. Edited by zaius137, : No reason given. Edited by zaius137, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
quote: Do you have a citation, decay flux is usually inside the error figure. I know there is evidence for radioactive decay variability (let us talk).
quote: That is the accepted date but as I have shown there are problems. Other issues follow from the reliability of CMB as a gage. For instance CMB is not casting the predicted shadow
quote: It is a 5d model by Carmeli: CARMELI’S COSMOLOGY: THE UNIVERSE IS SPATIALLY FLAT WITHOUT DARK MATTER | SpringerLink
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
quote: Yes metals are created in stars, I am not unfamiliar with thermonuclear fusion. The real issue is empirical evidence. God could have created the universe by the BB, that proposition is in doubt. I reject the BB on the merits of science alone. I am not looking for verification from science to enforce my worldview. On the contrary, my worldview enforces my view of science. I do not have enough faith to take speculation as a tautology. Edited by zaius137, : No reason given. Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Fix quote box. Was no "/" in the closer.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
quote: I believe that measured decay error variance may be because some elements decay rate changes with times of the year (maybe rotation of the sun’s core). Here are some links The Sun Alters Radioactive Decay Rates | The Institute for Creation Research http://dinosaurc14ages.com/changedecay.htm The Sun is changing the rate of radioactive decay, and breaking the rules of chemistry Do nuclear decay rates depend on our distance from the sun? « the physics arXiv blog Republikslot: Daftar 10 Situs Judi Slot Dan Casino Online Terbaik
Decay Rate of Radon-222 as a function of date and time of day. The color-bar gives the power of the observed signal and represents ~4% seasonal decay rate variation. Republikslot: Daftar 10 Situs Judi Slot Dan Casino Online Terbaikhttp://phys.org/news202456660.html Big question in my mind If Carbon 14 has not varied in the past how come there is measurable amounts in diamonds, fossils and coal seams? Edited by zaius137, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
Facts are facts, it is the interpretation of facts that is important.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
quote: CARMELI’S COSMOLOGY also gives us a galactrocentric universe, yes old, but still conforms to a creationist cosmology. Big Bang has no more predictive power, the 5d does. Edited by zaius137, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
quote: You mean Dr. Bertshe the MD? Sorry he is a physicist (Kirk) The person he criticizes is John R. Baumgardner a geophysicist. You have to be kidding.. Went threw that citation of yours but did not find a significant argument against 14C in diamonds. I am willing to review your proof of that statement. Otherwise I will view your opinion as just an opinion. 14C was detected, does that stament hurt that much? Edited by zaius137, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
quote: I did not claim that 14C varied significantly as measured today. If 14C is in diamonds or coal they can not be as old as claimed or the decay rate has varied over time in a significant way. One or the other. If radio active decay varied at all, even .01% (not just error in measurement) then the principle of radio decay invariance is nonsense. But maybe you prefer Dr. Bertshe the MD (Sorry he is a physicist (Kirk)) tell you that a geophysicist is wrong. Edited by zaius137, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
quote: I do not contest 14C dates we observe today. maybe they varied in the past, if they did not please explain 14C in diamonds.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
quote: Yes, regardless the credential a creationist is labeled a outsider.
quote: Carbon-14 is most commonly produced in the upper atmosphere from Nitrogen-14 not in diamonds or oil. How much Nitrogen-14 is in diamonds? Small amounts I would guess, so production in that way would be rare in diamonds. I would think that would be the same case for oil and coal right, just trace amounts. You could then assume that Carbon-14 production is rare in the host materials. I have every confidence that professor Baumgardner is familiar with sample contamination. Path for the rarer production of Carbon-14 like from your post.
quote: quote: I am not aware that 14C in rocks has that much relevance for dating them, I thought Potassium Argon dating was predominate for rock dating.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
quote: Good, now you can define a date of a diamond with 14C present? I do not contest the dates of Egyptian culture, simply because most dates correspond to dates in the Bible. You know that those older dates for 14C percentages are recalibrated to other dates to increase accuracy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
quote: Carbon control rods in reactors?? Once carbon is saturated with neutrons it is then less effective as a control rod.
They are composed of chemical elements such as boron, silver, indium and cadmium wiki Edited by zaius137, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zaius137 Member (Idle past 3440 days) Posts: 407 Joined: |
quote: I am not sure... that was from RAZD.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024