Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Congress goes off the deep end
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3455 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 50 of 126 (354067)
10-04-2006 1:42 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by New Cat's Eye
10-03-2006 3:57 PM


Re: Calling all Republicans to explain what's going on.
I don't know. My explanation involved maintaining a positive image while also doing things that would be deemed 'bad'. Like, they don't want to have to tell everyone when they're putting some dishonest wiretaps on terrorists. I don't care if they do but I can understand them wanting to hide it. We have to keep the good guys image.
Holy...holy shit. My eyes must be deceiving me.
So, in other words, in order to maintain the moral high ground, one does not actually have to have it, but only the illusion that one has it? It's okey-dokey to do dishonest, illegal or otherwise "bad" things as long as you are able to hide it? Wow. Just wow.
As for the rest of your post, this is the only other thing I feel the need to reply to:
Again, I don't know. Congress passed it. I don't know what reasons they had for passing it but I trust their judgement. Isn't that why they are in congress, to make these decisions?
They are in office in order to serve the people and to be our voices in the government. How in the hell can they be our voices or even pretend that they are serving in our interests if they do not have to answer to us or explain their rationale? They are not our parents. They are us.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-03-2006 3:57 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-04-2006 10:14 AM Jaderis has replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3455 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 64 of 126 (354205)
10-04-2006 2:55 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by New Cat's Eye
10-04-2006 10:14 AM


Re: Calling all Republicans to explain what's going on.
I don't think a discussion about what consitiutes maintining the moral high ground is on topic.
Sure it is.
And I apologize for not being more clear, which made it seem like I was misrepresenting you. I should have added "in the eyes of the world" to "maintain moral high ground." However, I am concerned with actually doing the right thing, not just the image of doing so, so my reply, to me, seemed complete at the time.
Absolutely. We are fighting terrorists. People who will blow themselves up to take out a bunch of innocent civilians. Fuck them. If we have to torture a terrorist to learn the location of a hidden bomb, then torture away. But, we should not go public about the torturing we do. We should keep it hidden to mainain the 'good guys' image
So, if you were being tortured would you always tell the truth? Or would you tell your captor anything to make it stop?
Additionally, how is one sure that the person they are torturing actually knows anything? How is one sure that they are indeed "the enemy?" Well, allowing for oversight and conducting fair trials is one way. If the rules can be made up as they go along(1) and they are not accountable to any other governmental body(2), unless Congress decides to revoke or amend this legislation, then how could we possibly know these things and how can someone who is detained, tortured and "tried" have any recourse?
(1)Sec.949a of the Military Comissions Act of 2006:
`(b) Exceptions- (1) The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Attorney General, may make such exceptions in the applicability in trials by military commission under this chapter from the procedures and rules of evidence otherwise applicable in general courts-martial as may be required by the unique circumstances of the conduct of military and intelligence operations during hostilities or by other practical need.
(2)Under Section 6 of the Military Comissions Act of 2006:
`(e)(1) No court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by or on behalf of an alien detained outside of the United States who--
`(A) is currently in United States custody; or
`(B) has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant.
`(2) Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 1005(e) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (10 U.S.C. 801 note), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any other action against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the detention, treatment, or trial of an alien detained outside of the United States who--
`(A) is currently in United States custody; or
`(B) has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant.
`(3) In this subsection, the term `United States', when used in a geographic sense, has the meaning given that term in section 1005(g) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005.'.
(b) Effective Date- The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply to all cases, without exception, pending on or after the date of the enactment of this Act which relate to any aspect of the detention, treatment, or trial of an alien detained outside the United States (as that term is defined in section 2241(e)(3) of title 28, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)) since September 11, 2001.
Section 1005(e) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 establishes the United States Court of appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit as having "exclusive jurisdiction to determine the validity of any final decision" of the tribunals, HOWEVER:
(C) SCOPE OF REVIEW- The jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on any claims with respect to an alien under this paragraph shall be limited to the consideration of--
(i) whether the status determination of the Combatant Status Review Tribunal with regard to such alien was consistent with the standards and procedures specified by the Secretary of Defense for Combatant Status Review Tribunals (including the requirement that the conclusion of the Tribunal be supported by a preponderance of the evidence and allowing a rebuttable presumption in favor of the Government's evidence)
(So the only argument allowed for appeals is to determine if the accused was correctly determined to be an enemy combatant in a closed door session after a military tribunal); and
(ii) to the extent the Constitution and laws of the United States are applicable, whether the use of such standards and procedures to make the determination is consistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(So the allowance of warrantless wiretaps and torture are applicable as they are now conveniently (and retroactively) legal.)
AND:
(C) LIMITATION ON APPEALS- The jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit under this paragraph shall be limited to an appeal brought by or on behalf of an alien--
(i) who was, at the time of the proceedings pursuant to the military order referred to in subparagraph (A), detained by the Department of Defense at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and
(which leaves out any combatants detained and sent elsewhere in our "extraordinary rendition" program)
(ii) for whom a final decision has been rendered pursuant to such military order.(which prevents any claims being brought on behalf of detainees before they are tried. How many have been tried so far? Do they have to be tried or are they indefinitely imprisoned and tortured?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-04-2006 10:14 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-04-2006 3:52 PM Jaderis has replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3455 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 69 of 126 (354263)
10-04-2006 6:45 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by New Cat's Eye
10-04-2006 3:52 PM


Re: Calling all Republicans to explain what's going on.
Sorry to just blow you off on this, as it looks like you put some time and effort into you post, but I don't think pursuing this discussion is on topic.
You may be right that discussion of the legislation that overrides the Geneva Conventions and the right of habeas corpus is off topic because the OP pertains to the wiretap legislation, but I believe that the topic may be stretched to include the general hacking away of rights perpetrated by the Bush Administration and its pet Congress in recent years since they are all "answers" to the same threat and the wiretap legislation can be tied into the Military Comissions Act via warrantless wiretaps' new role as permissible evidence.
If Kuresu and/or the Admins disagree I will open a new topic regarding this particular example of Congress going "off the deep end" and I would hope that you will then address my post.
I also have some work to do here at work and don't have much time left for posting today.
That's OK. If we are permitted to continue this here, take your time. If I am directed to take it elsewhere, you will have plenty of time because I will then be constructing a much more thorough OP.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-04-2006 3:52 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-05-2006 9:21 AM Jaderis has not replied
 Message 82 by kuresu, posted 10-05-2006 12:21 PM Jaderis has not replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3455 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 121 of 126 (355223)
10-08-2006 3:11 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by Silent H
10-08-2006 9:56 AM


The "Why?" of it all
The point is that, in a democracy, we can work to reduce the number of people on the receiving end of injustice and suffering. We have done it many times (check out all those nice Ammendments the next time you look at our Constitution). Just throwing your hands up and abdicating your responsibility to promote justice fairness just because we will never achieve perfection is a completely false dilemma.
Very well stated Schraf.
Those of us active in the Peace and Justice movements are not suffering under the delusion that we are going to acheive total harmony among the peoples of this world or that human suffering will be completely eradicated. What we are working towards is the lessening of injustice and violence and speaking out against the people/governments who perpetrate such acts because we feel that if we do not then we are just as bad as them (if not worse, because, unlike them, we recognize the actions as abhorrent).
"To stand in silence when they should be protesting makes cowards out of men." - Abraham Lincoln
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
"Als die Nazis die Kommunisten holten,
habe ich geschwiegen;
ich war ja kein Kommunist.
Als sie die Sozialdemokraten einsperrten,
habe ich geschwiegen;
ich war ja kein Sozialdemokrat.
Als sie die Gewerkschafter holten,
habe ich nicht protestiert;
ich war ja kein Gewerkschafter.
Als sie die Juden holten,
habe ich nicht protestiert;
ich war ja kein Jude.
Als sie mich holten,
gab es keinen mehr, der protestierte.
When the Nazis arrested the Communists,
I said nothing; after all,
I was not a Communist.
When they locked up the Social Democrats,
I said nothing; after all,
I was not a Social Democrat.
When they arrested the trade unionists,
I said nothing; after all,
I was not a trade unionist.
When they arrested the Jews, I said nothing; after all,
I was not a Jew.
When they arrested me, there was no longer anyone who could protest. "
-Pastor Martin Niemoller

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by Silent H, posted 10-08-2006 9:56 AM Silent H has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by nator, posted 10-08-2006 4:39 PM Jaderis has not replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3455 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 122 of 126 (355226)
10-08-2006 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by Silent H
10-08-2006 9:56 AM


When anyone said that it was about other people's lives you admitted that could be true, but why should you care because it won't effect you.
What's even more sad, holmes, about CS's apathy is that he would deny me my right to get married to the woman I want to spend the rest of my life with because he might abuse the system to get benefits for his BMX buddy and therefore destroy the meaning of a WORD for him, but he doesn't care two shits about people being tortured or their constitutional right to habeas corpus being taken away or their privacy being violated, etc etc.
And the religious right conservatives are worried about this country going down the drain because I"M GAY????
Give me a frakkin break! (yes, I'm a BSG geek )

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by Silent H, posted 10-08-2006 9:56 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by Silent H, posted 10-09-2006 5:36 AM Jaderis has replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3455 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 126 of 126 (355417)
10-09-2006 3:31 PM
Reply to: Message 125 by Silent H
10-09-2006 5:36 AM


Hey, I'm still confused in that I asked for a person to explain how it fit with traditional conservative principles, and he delivered a response of "what, me worry?". That isn't what I asked at all.
Of course not. I would think that someone with traditionally conservative ideals could do no such thing, so you are left with the Bush worshippers who probably don't even understand the question and people, like CS, who just stick their head in the sand.
And what's more, according to his own line of argument he would have no problem with outlawing weapons. That would clearly be against the values of the traditional rep base. But I see no reason he could give to be against it.
Indeed I find some eyebrow arching power in the fact that NRA members are not up in arms with what Bush and Co are doing. So many claim that ownership is their right in order to defend themselves against a tyrranical gov't. How exactly are they planning on coordinating such efforts without the right to privacy or private communication? They might as well hand over their guns now.
Hey, you may be on to something, here. Maybe they just aren't seeing it in that light, yet. At any rate, their silence is interesting indeed.
To be fair this country really is going down the drain because you, in specific, are gay. If you'd just straighten up and fly right this nation could really pull itself together.
I know, I know. I'm just too busy luring young, innocent, straight girls into my web of sin.
But watch it I did and I was stunned. I couldn't believe the quality of the production up and down the board. And it was mature too. Unfortunately dutch tv showed only the first season and now I'm stuck. Frak.
I felt the same apprehension going in because, to be quite frank, the majority of SciFi shows are pretty subpar in all areas except special effects (and even some of the shows are lacking in this) and the original series makes me cringe. However, I am completely addicted to this new series because of the excellent writing, outstanding cast, great cinematography and the intellectual and moral challenges it presents to the viewer. This is what true Sci-fi is all about - timely political commentary (not forced down your throat, but allowing you to ponder and conclude for yourself what you would do, feel, think in such a situation) wrapped up in a fantastical, entertaining and gripping shell
You really should either buy the DVD's or download the series on a BitTorrent client (Hey the show is free to watch, so why not free to download).
Sorry Admins, I know this last bit is OT. That's the last of the BSG discussion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by Silent H, posted 10-09-2006 5:36 AM Silent H has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024