Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dawkins - 'The God Delusion'
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5903 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 8 of 167 (352797)
09-28-2006 9:47 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Archer Opteryx
09-28-2006 7:50 AM


Although I have not read The God Delusion, I have read many of his other works. I tend to stay away from the "religion-bashing" aspects of his work.
For those interested, his website has links to numerous articles discussing the book, including from the Guardian and the Economist, as well as a BBC interview.
For Archer: Dawkins has been a prolific "pop-sci" author on evolution for many years. He is quite a good writer, and well worth reading. The Blind Watchmaker, Climbing Mount Improbable, and The Selfish Gene are all what I would consider classics of the genre. On the other hand, he HAS gotten himself into trouble - both with scientists and laypeople - on occasion. For instance, he was sort of "forced" to write The Extended Phenotype to "correct" misunderstandings and misinterpretations (his words) contained in The Selfish Gene. In Phenotype he both backed off from some of his earlier assertions, and expanded on others, making it a substantially better book all around.
Other books I have read of his include Unweaving the Rainbow (a counter to the "believers'" assertion that only through the supernatural can one have a sense of wonder), River Out of Eden (about life evolution from the point of view of the flow of genes down through the aeons), and The Ancestor's Tale (using the metaphor of Chaucer's Canterbury Tales to "backtrack" the lineage ending in humanity to its origin as a single cell). Of the three, the latter is probably the best of the lot. I personally rank Dawkins just below Sagan and Azimov, and certainly on a par with Ehrlich and Diamond (and just ahead of Gould), as a scientist who is capable of describing highly complex subjects and concepts to laypersons in an engaging and understandable manner, while at the same time retaining the "hard science" of the most recent research.
Edited to add: There is a lengthy discussion of The God Delusion at iidb.org, although most of the thread is discussing Dawkins, rather than the book. Still, there might be some interest there.
Edited by Quetzal, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-28-2006 7:50 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5903 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 27 of 167 (353098)
09-29-2006 10:11 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by SteveN
09-29-2006 8:23 AM


Hi Steven,
Thanks for the precis. Have you read Gould's Rock of Ages? I'd be interested in seeing someone make a comparison between the highly conciliatory Rock (which I've read), and Dawkins' apparently unconciliatory Delusion (which I have not). In any event, thanks again for the outline you provided.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by SteveN, posted 09-29-2006 8:23 AM SteveN has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by SteveN, posted 09-29-2006 10:28 AM Quetzal has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024