Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Disagreeing with laws and upholding laws and arguing they should be upheld
subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 30 of 79 (441783)
12-18-2007 6:29 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by macaroniandcheese
12-18-2007 2:59 PM


law-enforcement personel have the responsibility to enforce all laws currently in use.
Not only is this wrong, it's a practical impossibility. If the U.S. or any political subdivision thereof tried to enforce every law on the books, it would have to devote virtually every resource in that body to the effort.
Law enforcement, whether you are talking about the police or the prosecutors, has limited resources. Thus, one of the policy decisions that the heads of the various branches of law enforcement has to make is how to use those limited resources. At any given time, some laws are enforced more vigorously than others, and some are even ignored.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by macaroniandcheese, posted 12-18-2007 2:59 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by macaroniandcheese, posted 12-18-2007 8:13 PM subbie has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024