Do you have a reference for this? I think it's very very very very unlikely. It is true that routine infant circumcision was often done without parental consent - before our modern age of litigation arrived.
Sorry mandatory is too strong a word, but compulsory or even 'without parental consent' would be sufficient for me to be highly upset.
I know because my fiance's brothers were both circumcised and the parents were not consulted on this in this (70s-80s). When I asked their mother, she was under the impression that they 'had to have it, all boys had to be circumsized'. Kinda like refusing to take an innoculation when you're in pre-school I suppose.
With all medical 'evidence' pointing towards the negative effects of not being circumsized, I see very few parents insisting on keeping the skin
.
Gardening | Mothering Forum
"The radical practice of routinely circumcising babies did not begin until the Cold War era. This institutionalization of what amounted to compulsory circumcision was part of the same movement that pathologized and medicalized birth and actively discouraged breastfeeding. Private-sector, corporate-run hospitals institutionalized routine circumcision without ever consulting the American people. There was no public debate or referendum. It was only in the 1970s that a series of lawsuits forced hospitals to obtain parental consent to perform this contraindicated but highly profitable surgery. "
- How accurate I dont know.
[This message has been edited by Zealot, 09-10-2003]