Hi Iano,
I think there some things that still need clarification, and it might come down to this:
Uniformitarianism, as defined by Lyell, consists of four principles:
1. uniformity of law
2. uniformity of process (actualism)
3. uniformity of rate (gradualism)
4. uniformity of state (steady-statism)
(I'm not sure to what level each branch of historical science holds to each of these elements. Percy's link (msg 61)indicated that geologists for example, only hold to elements 1 & 2 )
First, uniformitarianism is a geological concept, and as Bill Birkeland pointed out, modern geologists only hold to 1 and perhaps 2. The other sciences never adhered to the principle of uniformitarianism. Perhaps Lyell's original view of it could have found application in other sciences, but the fact of the matter is that it never did.
So you can stop pondering whether the other "historical sciences" still hold to any of Lyell's principles. The fact of the matter is that they never did. This is not to say that such fields as cosmology and archeology did not at one time accept some of the same principles expressed by Lyell, only that they never grouped them under a principle called uniformitarianism.
Today, most geologists, most cosmologists, most archeologists, indeed most scientists everywhere, accept principle 1, uniformity of law. Principle 2, uniformity of process, would seem to have variable application depending upon the field of science. Principles 3 (uniformity of rate) and 4 (uniformity of state) are accepted by very few scientists as general principles, though of course these terms are perfectly applicable in certain specific situations.
--Percy