Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Bush promotes ID
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 822
From: Orlando,FL
Joined: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 5.7


Message 149 of 195 (233975)
08-17-2005 8:56 AM
Reply to: Message 148 by Tal
08-17-2005 8:51 AM


Re: On a lighter note...Dean says No to ID
One that believes a dog can produce a non-dog (despite zero evidence) and that a dog came from a rock 4.6 billion years agao (despite zero evidence).
Well it's a good thing that that's not what evolution say then isn't it? Really Tal, if you are going to make snide remarks about Evolution, you should have at least a basic understanding of what it is. You are only displaying your ignorance about evolution with your post.
This message has been edited by kjsimons, 08-17-2005 08:57 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by Tal, posted 08-17-2005 8:51 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by Tal, posted 08-17-2005 9:11 AM kjsimons has replied

  
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 822
From: Orlando,FL
Joined: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 5.7


Message 151 of 195 (233991)
08-17-2005 9:29 AM
Reply to: Message 150 by Tal
08-17-2005 9:11 AM


Re: On a lighter note...Dean says No to ID
No it doesn't and if you would just even read one good textbook on evolution you would know that. Evolution doesn't cover how life first started, that's abiogenisis. Evolution also doesn't say that one day, poof, a dog gives birth to a non-dog, it just says that genetic mutations coupled with selection pressures can change the genetic makeup of a species enough for it to become a new species. This is a gradual process and has been likened to a spectrum of light. There is no clear point at which one species became another (was it at mutation #500 or #632 or ...?) just as there is no clear point where red becomes orange, but we have different species that are closely related.
Now back on topic, I think it's great that there is actually a politician with a working brain who is willing to call ID what it is. Dean is a far better man than Bush in regards to science it appears. Bush has been one of the most anti-science presidents of late.
This message has been edited by kjsimons, 08-17-2005 09:30 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by Tal, posted 08-17-2005 9:11 AM Tal has not replied

  
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 822
From: Orlando,FL
Joined: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 5.7


Message 193 of 195 (274365)
12-31-2005 9:20 AM


Now it's the other Bush!
It appears the governor of the wind swept state of Florida also feels that there needs to be a "vigorous discussion of varying viewpoints in our classrooms" when it comes to teaching evolution. It's bad enough that the science standards in FL don't even mention evolution by name, now that want to further water down science education by bringing in non-scientific viewpoints about science into a science classroom. Take my governor (and president)... please!
Link to full article:
Jeb Speaks
This message has been edited by AdminJar, 12-31-2005 10:13 AM

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024