Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The 3 catch cries of uniformitarian geology are equally well explained by the Flood
Joe T
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 41
From: Virginia
Joined: 01-10-2002


Message 21 of 43 (25248)
12-02-2002 10:29 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by Tranquility Base
12-01-2002 6:21 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Tranquility Base:
Salyt beds? In our scenario the salt beds may have been generated due to precipitaiton due to either volcanic heating or even accelerated radiodecay. I wont pretend this is proven. It is how we would account for it at this point.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 12-01-2002]

This is not a tenable solution. Randy detailed the problems this presents with respect to the quantity of salt deposits present. Another problem is that we see precipitation of minerals (including salt) around volcanic vents today. The results look nothing like (in either apperance or chemistry) the salt deposits that are a part of the GC. Also salt deposits contain several lines of evidence that they were created subarially by evaporation (presence of pollen, dust, micrometeorites etc). I covered this in a post to TC some time back (see link below).
http://EvC Forum: why creation "science" isn't science -->EvC Forum: why creation "science" isn't science
Joe T.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Tranquility Base, posted 12-01-2002 6:21 PM Tranquility Base has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Tranquility Base, posted 12-02-2002 5:41 PM Joe T has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024