Evidence for and against Flood theories

Because of the reality of Coragyps mathematical analysis, the genesis flood requires redistribution, not dissolution of limestone during the event. I currently do not know of a sufficient mechanism of redistribution.Also, TheLiteralist, I believe that you are right that to some extent the event must have been supernatural (if not, then given enough time, it may very well happen again--but it won't). However, I believe that if God did not disregard current scientific advancement, he would not have made it some 'Goddidit' scenario. Science requires theories to be potentially falsifiable. If God had triggered the supposed event via accelerated radioisotopic decay, for example, that triggering mechanism needs to be potentially falsifiable.This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 01-04-2005 19:41 AM

Seashells on mountain tops are not evidence for a young earth or catastrophe.

quote:

---

Seashells on mountain tops are not evidence for a young earth or catastrophe.

Oh, they could be. But not the seashells we actually see in the mountains.

---

--Oh, I don't think even those seashells are evidence of a catastrophic global flood