Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 4/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Board Administration ⇒ Suggestions and Questions ⇒

The Faith "Great Debate" sedimentation and erosion topic

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Faith "Great Debate" sedimentation and erosion topic
Buzsaw
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 38 of 45 (194219)
03-24-2005 7:38 PM 		Reply to: Message 37 by AdminAsgara
03-24-2005 7:25 PM

Everyone does realize that this is not a debate forum per se?
This thread was designed to discuss the possible GD with Faith and an opponent.
It seems that Faith is saying she isn't sure she wants to participate in the GD but than continues in this thread debating the same topic.
​
It was my understanding that when Jar and I did our GD, that was to be the beginning of a well structured debate, which it was, so as to fix the hodpodge stuff that was called GD before that debate. Imo, it's not a good idea to have more than two people debating in the GD. Why? because you're pitting one mind against several minds. This is unbalanced and unfair, imo to the one who is obliged to refute a pack who're bitin the bit to contribute their two bits.
​
I suggest the GD thread committee not loose the progress made in organizing organized bonafide debates. The trouble with a parallel peanut gallery thread is that the minority debater can't do debate and respond to stuff offered in pg. Peanut gallery, imo should be held off until the debate is finished.
​
The GD Jar and I did was totally even handed in procedure and nobody could complain afterward that one side or the other had the advantage.
​
Food for thought.
​
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw
This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by AdminAsgara, posted 03-24-2005 7:25 PM AdminAsgara has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Buzsaw, posted 03-25-2005 1:28 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 42 by Adminnemooseus, posted 03-25-2005 2:10 AM Buzsaw has replied
Buzsaw
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 41 of 45 (194314)
03-25-2005 1:28 AM 		Reply to: Message 38 by Buzsaw
03-24-2005 7:38 PM

Bump.
​
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw
This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Buzsaw, posted 03-24-2005 7:38 PM Buzsaw has not replied
Buzsaw
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 43 of 45 (194539)
03-25-2005 8:30 PM 		Reply to: Message 42 by Adminnemooseus
03-25-2005 2:10 AM

Re: Yes, model any new "Great Debates" like the Jar/Buz one
Buz, I think I am in full agreement with you (see my message 29).
​
Mmm, somehow I missed 29. Thanks Moose.
​
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw
This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Adminnemooseus, posted 03-25-2005 2:10 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024