Brad! In no way was my post meant to be insulting, it was meant to be complementary; and I don't think you should be 'banished' by any means, unless you yourself desire to better communicate with the rest of the forum.
IT IS NOT WORD PLAY.
I KNOW!
I wasn't saying your posts were solely word-play, but that you often express your content in an almost poetic way (whether you realize it or not).
Really, Brad, it was a complement.
But do realize that the vast majority here don't read or don't understand your posts, and not because of our intelligence or desire (necessarily).
You write:
YOus dont get it!... You just dont know...
yous need to lear WHAT IKNOW....
Dont want to KNOW what I KNOW. DONt but dont blame me. Blame your teachers. I try...
True, Brad, most of us don't know what you're talking about.
So explain it to us; try to express your ideas in a way that the rest of us can understand.
For example, you incessantly name-drop, as in the post I'm replying to... try to accept the fact that few in the forum have an idea of Smalhausen's work, let alone how it applies to your argument, or a rereading of Kant. Perhaps try to post without the name-dropping, and with more explanation of the work done by the people with the names?
Hopefully you'll take this as constructive, do what you will with it...