Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Human Origins and Evolution ⇒

Was Nebraska Man a fraud?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Was Nebraska Man a fraud?
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 3 of 46 (86844)
02-17-2004 12:32 AM 		Reply to: Message 1 by Sylas
02-16-2004 11:44 PM

Start a new thread and discuss them, then. I dare you.
​
I already opened one. Message 1
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Sylas, posted 02-16-2004 11:44 PM Sylas has not replied
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 14 of 46 (86978)
02-17-2004 11:19 AM 		Reply to: Message 9 by Dr Jack
02-17-2004 6:27 AM

Of course it is nice to be concise Mr jack. However, as Sylas notes below, it was necessary to get all the facts straight. This one couldn't be done with anything less given the obstinancy of Skeptick and some others like him/her.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Dr Jack, posted 02-17-2004 6:27 AM Dr Jack has not replied
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 24 of 46 (97422)
04-03-2004 2:58 AM 		Reply to: Message 22 by wj
04-02-2004 10:28 PM

Re: The Central Issue
There is no reason to start making fun(yet).
​
Teen is a good enough short form for the nic. Don't you think?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by wj, posted 04-02-2004 10:28 PM wj has not replied
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 33 of 46 (100371)
04-16-2004 10:43 AM 		Reply to: Message 32 by Dr Jack
04-16-2004 10:37 AM

Re: Human Evolution?
Mr J. This is a bit close to 'bare links'. Could you make it easier for everyone and pull the contrasting pieces out of the links. Thanks.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Dr Jack, posted 04-16-2004 10:37 AM Dr Jack has not replied
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 37 of 46 (100466)
04-16-2004 7:01 PM 		Reply to: Message 35 by Tiny man
04-16-2004 6:44 PM

logic?
Well, here is how I see it. Since Hablis is not a single creature - but a mixture of creatures - it can't be an ancestor and therefore is an invalid category for transitional status. With Hablis gone, there is no clear cut transmission between the Australopithecines and Homo Erectus.
​
You say, "since ... not a single ..." "it can't be..."
​
How is that? If the current list of species included in hablis are, in fact, a mix of species how does that mean that one of them can not be an ancestor to H. sapiens? I don't see your logic there.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Tiny man, posted 04-16-2004 6:44 PM Tiny man has not replied
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 38 of 46 (100467)
04-16-2004 7:02 PM 		Reply to: Message 36 by Tiny man
04-16-2004 6:48 PM

ape human
In your opinion. The evidence doesn't show it.
​
This is getting off topic. I will propose a new thread for this if you agree that you want to discuss the "evidence" that you have. I won't bother if you don't care to.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Tiny man, posted 04-16-2004 6:48 PM Tiny man has not replied
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 39 of 46 (100468)
04-16-2004 7:04 PM 		Reply to: Message 35 by Tiny man
04-16-2004 6:44 PM

SNR
Also, I am - by past experiences - very skeptical of talkorigins.com as they lie and change the evidence to support their theory. A classic example of this is the fact that there are no 3rd Stage SNRs in our galaxy - they say that there are a tonne of them. A total lie and contradictory to the real evidence. So I don't really trust that "sceintific" site.
​
This is also another thread. Would you like me to propose a topic on it?
​
In this case your source has been misleading you. One thing that you must understand is that it just might not be talkorigins that is lieing to you.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Tiny man, posted 04-16-2004 6:44 PM Tiny man has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by PaulK, posted 04-20-2004 6:19 AM NosyNed has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024