Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Can survival of the fittest accomodate morals?
rockondon
Member (Idle past 4953 days)
Posts: 40
Joined: 03-29-2010


Message 31 of 64 (552511)
03-29-2010 4:18 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by RAZD
03-25-2010 7:19 PM


Re: Lack of worldly knowledge?
The short answer is that mankind is a social animal in a social setting, therefore morality is an evolutionary trait.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by RAZD, posted 03-25-2010 7:19 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by RAZD, posted 03-30-2010 11:10 PM rockondon has replied

  
rockondon
Member (Idle past 4953 days)
Posts: 40
Joined: 03-29-2010


Message 33 of 64 (552840)
03-31-2010 12:05 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by RAZD
03-30-2010 11:10 PM


Re: Lack of worldly knowledge?
A better answer is that:
Mankind is a social animal in a social setting, therefore human morality is a social morality. This is in fact what we see.
I agree. Well, said.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by RAZD, posted 03-30-2010 11:10 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024