CS writes:
I heard it was: You can either be right, or you can be happy.
Well, me, too. But that phrase implies that your spouse is wrong but you're willing to admit fault just to keep the peace. I see it as demeaning.
There are ways we can confront our spouses of their faults without stirring things up.
That example about my wife telling me never to criticize anything about her parents' house again. She could have brought it up in a really bad way, like yelling from the top of her lungs. She could have been crying while doing it. She could even have told me to fuck off. But instead, she told me directly that it hurt her feelings when I say things like that.
On my part, I could have been defensive about it and yelled at her saying I was only joking and she was taking it too seriously. I could have been sarcastic about it. I could have even lied and said "ok, you're right, I was a jackass."
I still think there was nothing wrong with me joking about the internet thing. At the same time, I realize that it upsetted her. A simple "ok, I understand" was sufficient.
I guess what I'm trying to say in too many words is I am convinced mutual understanding is the key. You can both be right and be happy. When you try to convey something that have upsetted you, say how you feel, not how bad the other person is. For example, take a look at the following statements. No, I didn't come up with this on my own. I got it from a book about successful marriage I once read.
"Why the hell do you have to be so loud in the morning and wake everyone up with you?"
"I know you're in a hurry in the morning, but I would really appreciate it if you could be a little quieter in the morning. I really need to get some sleep."
It's really how you say it instead of what you say.