RAZD in Message 190 writes:
Curiously there was no reply to Dr Adequate ...
Wonder why.
Curiously, you are not reading well. Review
Message 172 (click link) for which Dr. Adequate had no reply due to his hurting eyes in Message 174.
Also review
Message 189 (click link) againslowly where you will find this:
What this thread reveals instead is the piled-up snark of derogatory dodges, illegitimate taunts, and morbid mocks — including a trick-or-treat charade (click link) by an unemployed math guy who fancies himself a real scientist with imaginary credentials that publishers could magically market to the general public — despite evidence to the contrary presented in this thread from a publisher’s managing editor.
Even more curiously, if you're confident in your assessments, why not help us find firm commitments from qualified scientists to bring it to a publishable debate that could benefit millions of folks as you've mused how to reach outside EvC Forum?
The qualifications are the same for both sides of the debate. Only the creation side is committed, qualified, and ready for contractual engagement.
All the Best,
Eye-Squared-R
Edited by Eye-Squared-R, : Responding to RAZD edit.
™ Version 4.2