Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,879 Year: 4,136/9,624 Month: 1,007/974 Week: 334/286 Day: 55/40 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dunning-Kruger Effect
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4045
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 7.4


Message 4 of 13 (567066)
06-29-2010 2:07 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by misha
06-29-2010 1:51 PM


Until someone is shown that they are wrong they are highly unlikely to suspect they are wrong. We've used all of our evaluation tools to formulate our original hypothesis, it seems ridiculous to believe we could use the same tools to find out where our hypothesis is wrong. Using the same faulty tools will give us the same faulty response.
This is one of the key flaws in human cognition - we tend to establish a hypothesis and then perform tests that would confirm the hypothesis, not tests that would falsify the hypothesis.
We can be trained out of that mental trap, but it can be difficult, and more so if the hypothesis in question is emotionally significant.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by misha, posted 06-29-2010 1:51 PM misha has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024