Summations Only

His theory IS attempting to explain facts. The facts of how organisms have evolved.Maybe what you meant to say was "doesn't it worry you that you have no facts to back up your theory"? , but you were just overly sloppy in your use of the English language?If that is what you ACTUALLY meant to say, I would respond, Doesn't it bother you that you have no facts to back up your own favorite theory?Not only that, but doesn't it bother you that your favorite theory is not even particularly logical, given that science continues to see more and more evidence of epigentic changes happening rapidly- with virtually NO evidence for these so- called slow progressions of random biological roads which just so happen to lead to the promised land? Edited by Bolder-dash, : No reason given.

Well, it may not technically be DNA that passes on these life experiences, but knowledge is being passed on just the same. Does it matter if its physically our DNA doing this, or some other genetic pathway-just as long as it in in fact happening? You saying that this is impossible sounds rather naive.

But so what, what's your point?The knowledge of the organisms lifetime is being passed on genetically. Why does it matter if its located in the DNA? Its somewhere.