Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Confusing mice with mousetraps
Tusko
Member (Idle past 131 days)
Posts: 615
From: London, UK
Joined: 10-01-2004


Message 13 of 90 (188661)
02-26-2005 6:43 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Sylas
02-23-2005 2:57 AM


Hang on... I'm just going to have to spell this out to make sure I'm understanding you correctly.
Are they saying that to recognise something that has been designed, it must be distinguished from the naturally occuring or undesigned, and that whether it appears to be designed or naturally occuring is a meaningful indicator of whether it was or not?
If this is the case then by recognising that the faces are the products of design, the IDer proves that god didn't have a hand in making any of the natural world!
If that makes sense then you are right, it is funny!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Sylas, posted 02-23-2005 2:57 AM Sylas has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024