Summations Only

I think what everybody is afraid of is another tedious Buzsaw exchange, where you assert without evidence the patently impossible, allow requests for supporting evidence to go unanswered, and then when they can be ignored no longer you just assert that you've already provided the evidence and they can go back and find it... somewhere.If you could learn to produce both an argument and the evidence to support it, perhaps in the same post, I think you would find that you were more interesting and thus that more people were willing to debate with you. As it stands, literally everybody knows how this is going to shake out - Cavediver will effortlessly refute every single one of your premises in his first post, and then the rest of the 300 posts will be you refusing to admit it and lying about the exchange.You're boring, Buz, and your position has not once ever changed in the light of information you were not previously aware of. All you do in response to disconfirming evidence is slink off until you figure everybody's forgotten about your latest embarrassment, and then you're back with the same old shtick. Why would anybody talk to you?

Aside from noting that you've apparently lost all ability to write sentences in proper English, I would simply point out that you frequently invade threads that are already pretty intense to deliver an "attaboy" to the newest creationist, regardless of the quality of his arguments or even whether he's defending a creationism you agree with. (It's fairly obvious that it doesn't matter to creationists; unlike evolutionists, who criticize each other when the quality of argument being put forth is not up to snuff, creationists see solidarity as more important than honesty.) Because you repeat your evidenceless claims over and over again, and people ask you for the evidence over and over again. If you think your threads are such a hotbed of intellectual discourse, Buz, then here's my question for you: why are they always 300 posts or more of people asking you for evidence? Because you've never provided any?I'm actually aware of quite a bit of archeological evidence that supports elements of the "Biblical record" - there are actually some things that the Bible got right, and I have no problem being a secular atheist and admitting that.But here's the thing, Buz - I never learned about any of that evidence from you. I've had to go around you, and around all you creationist "types", to actually learn about the real evidence that supports elements of the Biblical record.Why is that? Come on, Buz. You know me. I've been here as long as you have - I joined 6 days after you did.Do you really think I'm in cahoots with the admins? Do you really think the admins would suffer to be in cahoots with me?