Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Which More 3LoT Compatible, Cavediver's Temp.Non-ID Or Buzsaw's Infinite ID Universe
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 24 of 304 (621982)
06-29-2011 10:28 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Buzsaw
06-28-2011 11:22 PM


Since when do you accept scientific findings? Why does your "non-intelligent/non-infinite designer" need to fit within the laws of thermodynamics? Why do you accept the laws of thermodynamics, but practically no other scientific findings?

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Buzsaw, posted 06-28-2011 11:22 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 25 of 304 (621984)
06-29-2011 10:30 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Buzsaw
06-29-2011 10:27 PM


Re: jar's position
The ID source of work, i.e. Jehovah, via rest and via the multipresent Holy Spirit would receive energy from the system, gathering energy from forces within the system. This would entail no need for an infinite amount (I say amount) of emergu, the amount of energy always remaining the same as per 1LoT. The Biblical record depicts the designer as managing the universe by creating and destroying things in the universe to suit the designer/creator's purpose.
Ahh, that explains it. You want to invoke hokus pokus while trying to debate actual science. You see buz, once you invoke magic, you kinda stop talking about science......

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Buzsaw, posted 06-29-2011 10:27 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Buzsaw, posted 06-29-2011 10:40 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 32 of 304 (621992)
06-29-2011 11:31 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by Buzsaw
06-29-2011 10:40 PM


Re: jar's position
It is not restricted to a secularistic application of science
Since you've not supplied your own "biblical laws of thermodynamics", you very much ARE restricted to "secular" science since the LoT's are secular and not biblical. Magic doesn't jive with science.
None of this, of course will strictly secular minded folks like you ever admit to, no matter how empirical or how much is cited.
But you NEVER reveal anything emperical and you've been told this in every thread you ever partake in. Magic does not equal emperical....
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Buzsaw, posted 06-29-2011 10:40 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 33 of 304 (621993)
06-29-2011 11:42 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Phat
06-29-2011 11:17 PM


Re: No Evidence Of Absence
An Intelligent Designer is a belief, not a fact.
Oh so very true. It's just that the laws of thermodynamics are NOT belief. They ARE fact and buz is trying to use them as some sort of evidence for his god.

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Phat, posted 06-29-2011 11:17 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 51 of 304 (622062)
06-30-2011 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Buzsaw
06-30-2011 10:18 AM


Re: Clarification Of Topic
The topic should not be restricted to a secularistic application of science.
So then, you have some biblical laws of thermodynamics? Or are you referring to the secular laws of thermodynamics?

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Buzsaw, posted 06-30-2011 10:18 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 60 of 304 (622170)
07-01-2011 12:59 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by Buzsaw
07-01-2011 10:36 AM


Re: Buzsaw Be Boring?
Crashfrog, two things. If I be boring, why do threads which I engage in get the intensity red lines appear quite consistently?
2 reasons:
1: We hate seeing you so stupid. Some of us are actually here to set the record straight. Ya know, teach and learn?
2: When people stop debating you are stop participating in the threads you muddy up, you claim victory. We can't have that.

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Buzsaw, posted 07-01-2011 10:36 AM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 64 of 304 (622203)
07-01-2011 3:47 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by ICANT
07-01-2011 3:32 PM


Re: What Is The More Scientifically Compatible = Scientific Debate
I do believe that the realm that God dwells in is the same realm that the universe we live in exists in.
2. Jehovah (God the Father) does not hang out within the universe we live in.
Wow ICANT. You managed to contradict yourself in the same post. I'm impressed. Congratulations.

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by ICANT, posted 07-01-2011 3:32 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by ICANT, posted 07-01-2011 4:21 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 68 of 304 (622239)
07-01-2011 6:46 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by ICANT
07-01-2011 4:21 PM


Re: What Is The More Scientifically Compatible = Scientific Debate
You're right. I misread. I apologize. However:
God lives in a realm.
The universe we live in exists in that realm.
Then why do even attempt to wedge him into fitting within the laws of our universe? Ya know, the topic at hand?
{abe}
You know who else lives in a realm? Orcs.
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by ICANT, posted 07-01-2011 4:21 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by ICANT, posted 07-01-2011 8:30 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 70 of 304 (622250)
07-01-2011 8:32 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by ICANT
07-01-2011 8:30 PM


Re: What Is The More Scientifically Compatible = Scientific Debate
Then why are you commenting on the topic?

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by ICANT, posted 07-01-2011 8:30 PM ICANT has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 108 of 304 (623040)
07-07-2011 10:10 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by Buzsaw
07-07-2011 9:55 PM


Re: Purposefully Limiting The Research.
Perhaps you coulld start a thread on verifiable ways to test for the metaphysical? I'd LOVE to see/perform some of the tests.

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Buzsaw, posted 07-07-2011 9:55 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 131 of 304 (624250)
07-16-2011 6:22 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by Buzsaw
07-16-2011 6:03 PM


Re: Deprivation Of Training Basics.
So you want college level physics to invoke magic? Or should they just teach alchemy in lieu of physics? Wait, wait, I know: you actually have some evidence for this "operative intelligent designer"? I assure you, we are all waiting with baited breath for you to supply evidence of this " operative intelligent designer" that is worthy of college level physics courses.
8k+ posts on this board and you still haven't done so tells me you've got nothing but apologetics and whining about how we "secularists" won't accept your lack of evidence as evidence, my dear chap.

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by Buzsaw, posted 07-16-2011 6:03 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 154 of 304 (642625)
11-30-2011 9:44 AM
Reply to: Message 152 by Buzsaw
11-30-2011 7:26 AM


which is a 2d one supposedly modeling a 3d Universe
If you cannot tell the difference between 2d and 3d, how can you ever expect to grasp ANY cosmological model?

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by Buzsaw, posted 11-30-2011 7:26 AM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 158 of 304 (642634)
11-30-2011 10:54 AM
Reply to: Message 155 by Buzsaw
11-30-2011 10:26 AM


Re: BB Model?
That's why the only visible model you have is a admittedly inadequate 2d balloon, illogically depicting a 3d universe.
Again, Buz, if you think an inflated balloon, which is used as an illusory tool to show laypersons how space-time is expanding, is 2d.....you are hopeless to understand anything even remotely complex about cosmology.
The predictions of the math on the BB fail to predict what is observed by the physical eye. That's what I mean by abstract and illogical.
False. Cosmic Background Radiation was predicted and found.
We do not observe disorder naturally void of intelligent design emerge into order and complexity
How are stars formed? How are galaxies formed? Do you know what a nebula is? (Hint: they are formed out of chaos by entirely natural processes)
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by Buzsaw, posted 11-30-2011 10:26 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


(2)
Message 181 of 304 (643424)
12-06-2011 7:35 PM
Reply to: Message 180 by Buzsaw
12-06-2011 7:17 PM


Re: BB Model?
That's why it's scientific.
Why do you feel the need to label it science, while at the same time decrying the scientific method? You have mocked "secular" science in the following posts in this thread alone:
Message 28
Message 47
Message 54
Message 58
Message 130
Message 175
Why not just call it what it is? Contrary to Buz belief, science in it's very nature IS secular. What you are doing would be deemed, IMO, "creation science". Again: why the appeal to call what you are doing science when it is obvious you have no intention on actually doing or respecting science? Do you really think anyone buys into your delusion that you are doing science?
Don't worry, I don't expect an actual response since you didn't actually respond to me pointing out your lack of ability to distinguish between 2 dimensions and 3.....

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by Buzsaw, posted 12-06-2011 7:17 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 183 by Buzsaw, posted 12-06-2011 10:31 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 186 of 304 (643440)
12-06-2011 11:16 PM
Reply to: Message 183 by Buzsaw
12-06-2011 10:31 PM


Re: BB Model?
Because it is science; just not totally secularist in nature.
Science, by it's very definition, is secular. What you are attempting to do is apologetics, not science. So again: why the appeal to science, because, as I pointed out (and as you have proven in your lengthy tenure here): you have no respect for what science is or what it can do, yet you try and label your batshittery as science at every turn.
Hooah, you might get more responses if you would take a lesson from Straggler, et al. Learn some lessons as to how to respond to messages respectfully and with sensible substance. Note how good spirited and having substance his messages, for the most part, are compared to yours. As Jesus suggested, remove the beam from your own eye before complaining of the sliver in another's.
Buz, you're like the crazy cat lady from down the road. You are not worthy of respect. The only reason I request a response is to point out that you don't have one for something so simple as differentiating between 2d and 3d. I don't give two fucks what you think of my replies to you or whether or not you actually reply. I engage you for the lurkers in the event that they are dumb enough to be bamboozled by your snake oil.
So again, I don't expect a reply. But I do expect you to duck and dodge and not address such simple matters as the difference between 2d and 3d. Oh, and I also expect a 90 something year old man to cry and piss and moan about fuck words like you've never heard them before.

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 183 by Buzsaw, posted 12-06-2011 10:31 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024