Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Article: Religion and Science
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 46 of 230 (218731)
06-22-2005 4:38 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Brian
06-22-2005 12:48 PM


Re: Where would it end?
The practices of Satanism are against some of our laws. We don't need other laws in this case.
Homeschoolers ARE regulated and have to meet state requirements. If they can pass the state tests that should be the limit of government tyranny in such questions it seems to me, but I know you would like it not to stop there.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Brian, posted 06-22-2005 12:48 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Brian, posted 06-22-2005 4:47 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 50 by TimChase, posted 06-22-2005 5:53 PM Faith has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4987 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 47 of 230 (218735)
06-22-2005 4:47 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Faith
06-22-2005 4:38 PM


Re: Where would it end?
I just used Satanism as an example, but allowing one group this luxury would mean that all groups should be granted it, there would be chaos in education circles.
but I know you would like it not to stop there.
I am against all forms of child abuse.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Faith, posted 06-22-2005 4:38 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by GDR, posted 06-22-2005 5:35 PM Brian has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 48 of 230 (218740)
06-22-2005 5:06 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Faith
06-22-2005 4:34 PM


Re: Home Schooling
So if they come to the conclusion that the world is only 6000 years old that would be graded as a right or wrong answer?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Faith, posted 06-22-2005 4:34 PM Faith has not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 49 of 230 (218747)
06-22-2005 5:35 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Brian
06-22-2005 4:47 PM


Re: Where would it end?
Briam writes:
I am against all forms of child abuse.
As you know Brian I'm not a literalist but I think that equating the teaching of YEC to kids with child abuse is just more than slightly over the top.
Even with evolution kids were taught until recently that one of our ancestors was Neanderthal man. DNA has shown that not to be the case. Some how I don't think it's done any lasting damage.
My biggest fear with kids and the teaching of YEC is that eventually they will look at it and come to the conclusion that it isn't true and as a result discard their faith entirely.
Yhat being said however if we are to start turning over our kids to the state in an Orwellian fashion we are going to cause a lot more damage to future generations than are a few home schoolers teaching YEC.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Brian, posted 06-22-2005 4:47 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Brian, posted 06-23-2005 8:14 AM GDR has replied

  
TimChase
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 230 (218752)
06-22-2005 5:53 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Faith
06-22-2005 4:38 PM


Re: Where would it end?
Dear Faith,
I assume these include standards regarding the teaching of science which would not regulate, for example, Bible studies?
Am I right?
I am sorry to seem so naive, but this isn't an issue I have really looked into.
Take care,
Tim

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Faith, posted 06-22-2005 4:38 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Faith, posted 06-22-2005 6:00 PM TimChase has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 51 of 230 (218753)
06-22-2005 6:00 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by TimChase
06-22-2005 5:53 PM


Re: Where would it end?
The standards are regular academic standards that public schools also have to meet, I don't know the specifics. Certainly shouldn't affect Bible study.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by TimChase, posted 06-22-2005 5:53 PM TimChase has not replied

  
TimChase
Inactive Member


Message 52 of 230 (218804)
06-22-2005 8:44 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by lfen
06-22-2005 12:39 AM


What do I mean by Quasi-Spinozist?
Sorry -- I didn't see this earlier.
Well, when I say that I am a quasi-Spinozist, atleast for me, it means that I identify God with the lawful nature of reality. As such, I do not believe that God is so much a person as a thing. However, putting things this way oftentimes is a bit too confusing for a lot of people, and involves unnecessarily long explanations. So typically I will just call myself an atheist.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by lfen, posted 06-22-2005 12:39 AM lfen has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4987 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 53 of 230 (218905)
06-23-2005 8:14 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by GDR
06-22-2005 5:35 PM


Re: Where would it end?
Hi,
As you know Brian I'm not a literalist but I think that equating the teaching of YEC to kids with child abuse is just more than slightly over the top.
But we are not talking abut just teaching YEC, we are talking about teaching the whole of the Bible as being literally true in a fundamentalist environment.
I sometimes think that people underestimate just how influential a teacher can be on the life of our children. Children (most anyway) literally think that everything their teachers say is true, some cannot imagine that there teacher would be wrong about something.
This is where the problems will come in. Children are entitled to a balanced education that will equip them with the skills to survive and cope in the adult world when they are ready to leave school. This places a lot of responsibility on teachers to ensure that their subject knowledge is of a decent standard and that they teach their subject as objectively as possible.
I teach five different faiths in my classes, and each one is given the same respect, I never bring my personal beliefs into the classroom. In fact, as I have said before here, if I did promote one faith over another I would be warned to be more careful in the future. If I persisted in promoting one faith then I would be eventually shown the door. Children at school should be shown the facts and figures and then be allowed to come to their own conclusions, that is what education is all about. We want to help equip youngsters with the skills that enable them to make informed choices. To do this, the teacher has to be as impartial as possible and just deliver the information in a suitable fashion for their students to understand.
There is no way on Earth that a fundamentalist teacher will give equal respect to Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism and Christianity.
Can you imagine a fundy Christian teacher telling a class that Jews, generally speaking, do not believe that the Messiah has been born yet, and then giving the reasons why and then leaving it at that? No danger, we all know what the lessons in Religious Education would consist of. This particular one would be about how wrong Jews are and that Jesus fulfilled all the messianic prophecies in the Old Testament, this is not a fair and balanced education that the child is getting. They would NOT be allowed to come to their own conclusions, they would be TOLD what is true and what isn’t, they wouldn’t be told just how many Old Testament prophecies Jesus didn’t fulfil, they wouldn’t be told that most of the prophecies mentioned in the New Testament aren’t really prophecies at all.
What would their history classes be filled with? Would they get a fair and balanced view of certain historical events? Would the ‘history’ in the Bible be the focus of all of the history courses? Would they be told that most of the history in the Bible is actually false history? Would they be told that miracles are outside the spectrum of historical enquiry? I don’t think so. They would be told that every word in the Bible is true and that it is all historically accurate, any child that asked a question would be given a Bible verse to look at, there would be virtually no external references for the child to consider.
Can you imagine a child who has a keen interest in Egyptology informing their history teacher that the Egyptian history goes back uninterrupted for nearly 7000 years? They would be given a Bible and asked to count up the years from Adam’s birth to Jesus birth, then told that Egyptian chronology is flawed, and when they ask why it is flawed they would be told because it doesn’t fit with what the Bible says!
It would go on and on throughout the entire curriculum. Geography, there was a world wide flood 4400 years ago, a child asks How do we know?, they are told, because the Bible says so.
Even with evolution kids were taught until recently that one of our ancestors was Neanderthal man. DNA has shown that not to be the case. Some how I don't think it's done any lasting damage.
But there is a huge difference here. I am not a scientist, but my colleagues inform me that the Neandethal Man — Human link was only ever taught as a theory, it was never taught as a fact. As far as I am aware, no scientific theory is ever taught as a fact, that is why it is termed a ‘theory’. For example, evolution is a fact, probably the most authenticated fact in the history of the world, but the reasons for evolution are taught as theories and not facts. Theories are only taught as the best possible explanation given the evidence that we have at the moment.
YEC has NEVER had ANY evidence to support it, in fact the only ‘evidence’ presented are ancient folk tales, and even then the followers don’t agree if it present an old or young universe! So, how can something that is so clearly a myth is taught in a science class?
Anyone attempting to do this is corrupting the intellectual development of the child, as it is tantamount to abuse.
My biggest fear with kids and the teaching of YEC is that eventually they will look at it and come to the conclusion that it isn't true and as a result discard their faith entirely.
Here is another problem, and one where my idea that the child is being abused comes in to play. Children are very impressionable, and during their years as ‘concrete’ learners all the foundations for the way they think is laid down. Constantly bombarding a child in the stages of concrete learning with utter crap will lead the child to believe that the utter crap is accurate. When you say that they will come to the conclusion that it isn’t true you are forgetting the ones who have been so brainwashed that they will never come to that conclusion. Even the ones that do come to that conclusion will not do so overnight, it is often a long drawn out process, how tormented will the child be when they find out that their parents have deliberately been feeding them bull for X amount of years? This torment is a result of being psychologically abused.
Yhat being said however if we are to start turning over our kids to the state in an Orwellian fashion
But no one is suggesting that. The Scottish Education system was the envy of the world at one time, I am not so sure anymore, but what is wrong with the system we have now? I am not familiar with the USA education system, but from what I read here it appears to be in some sort of crisis, there obviously was a time when it was running well and producing well-balanced, highly intelligent people, but, trust me, the rest of the world is beginning to think that the average American is some sort of half-wit. This is the image that is projected on TV screens around the world. On one channel you have Bush staring vacantly at a camera, unable to string two words together, he must be an embarrassment to all Americans. Turn to another station and you have the ‘God Channel’, and yes, Oh MY God, what a shower of morons on there, and almost all are Americans, what is happening to the USA?
we are going to cause a lot more damage to future generations than are a few home schoolers teaching YEC.
One child being abused is one too many.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by GDR, posted 06-22-2005 5:35 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by GDR, posted 06-23-2005 10:37 AM Brian has replied
 Message 65 by lfen, posted 06-23-2005 12:38 PM Brian has not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 54 of 230 (218931)
06-23-2005 10:37 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Brian
06-23-2005 8:14 AM


Re: Where would it end?
What you are talking about now though Brian is public education. In that case I agree with you completely.
However it is the job of parents to raise kids and it is not the job of the state. Parents of any belief, whether it be literalist Christians, orthodox Christians, liberal Christians, Buddhists, Atheists, Hindus Muslims etc.
If a child is sent to a fundamentalist Christian school the parents know the religious slant of that school. If the kids are sent to a public school the parents should be able to know that there is no religious slant to the teaching. To suggest that home schooling a kid and teaching him or her the religion of the parents regardless of which religion, (if any), they'll be taught, amounts to child abuse is, as a say, over the top.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Brian, posted 06-23-2005 8:14 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Brian, posted 06-23-2005 11:32 AM GDR has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4987 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 55 of 230 (218950)
06-23-2005 11:32 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by GDR
06-23-2005 10:37 AM


Re: Where would it end?
The discussion was concerning fundamentalist christians 'going their own way'.
However it is the job of parents to raise kids
Yes, but we are all responsible for ensuring that children are being looked after properly. If you suspect that a child is being abused in some way surely you would inform the correct services, even if you are ultimately wrong? You wouldnt expect social services to say, "well, it's their children, they can do what they want with them".
and it is not the job of the state.
These people live in the state, if they aren't happy with that state then bugger off to another one.
Parents of any belief, whether it be literalist Christians, orthodox Christians, liberal Christians, Buddhists, Atheists, Hindus Muslims etc.
It is still the state's responsibility to ensure that these children are being given a proper education, we all need to know what exactly is being taught in these schools. If a fundy school was teaching that Islam is a faith built on violence and fear, should that be allowed to be taught to children of an impressionable age? When woul dthe world ever get any better? Where does the tolerance come in?
If parents want to teach their faith to their kids out of normal school hours then that's fine, but at least the kids are equipped with the proper skills to decide whether mummy and daddy are talking shit or not.
If a child is sent to a fundamentalist Christian school the parents know the religious slant of that school.
And does the child get a say in this, or is it like being dragged along to Church to follow the faith of your parents. This is basically what it is, parents are bringing children up in THIER faith, it isn't the child's faith. The child is too young to work out what is going on, and by the time they do all the psychological abuse has made it difficult to let go of the fantasy world created by their parents.
Remember, we are not just talking about religious education here, a fundy school would include the Bible in every single class subject.
If the kids are sent to a public school the parents should be able to know that there is no religious slant to the teaching.
To suggest that home schooling a kid and teaching him or her the religion of the parents regardless of which religion, (if any), they'll be taught,
But we arent talking just about teaching the religion, we are talking about teaching science form a non-science book, history from a book that doesnt contain much real history, we are talking about teaching myths as FACTS. We arent talking about teaching kids that their faith BELIEVES that the universe is 6000 years old, we are talking about telling kids for a fact that it is 6000 years old and that any contrary evidence is wrong.
amounts to child abuse is, as a say, over the top.
Hey, you are entitled to your opinion, no probs at all, this is only my opinion based on some firsthand experience.
Brian.
This message has been edited by Brian, 06-23-2005 11:35 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by GDR, posted 06-23-2005 10:37 AM GDR has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Faith, posted 06-23-2005 11:52 AM Brian has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 56 of 230 (218955)
06-23-2005 11:52 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by Brian
06-23-2005 11:32 AM


Re: Where would it end?
If you hadn't allowed that GDR had a right to his opinion I wouldn't be so sure you were willing to allow that to anyone the way you talk. You are awfully certain that only your opinion is the truth and awfully friendly to the idea of dictating others' opinions with oppressive state power, and not only their opinions but their authority over their own children. You should start to suspect your tendencies toward totalitarianism.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Brian, posted 06-23-2005 11:32 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Brian, posted 06-23-2005 12:06 PM Faith has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4987 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 57 of 230 (218962)
06-23-2005 12:06 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by Faith
06-23-2005 11:52 AM


Re: Where would it end?
I have no problem with parents teaching their children about the parents' faith.
It is when aspects of that FAITH is being taught as fact, that there is a problem. Especially when children will not be informed about the evidence that disproves most of what the Bible says, if the text is taken literally of course. This is only relating to those matters that can be falsified, the spiritual side is either affirmed or denied, it is never proven. However, as history and archaeology have shown muchof the old testament to be exactly what it looks like, i.e. mythology, then this should not be taught as FACT. To inform a child that everything in the Bible is true, is not only a lie, it is also psychologically abuse.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Faith, posted 06-23-2005 11:52 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Faith, posted 06-23-2005 12:13 PM Brian has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 58 of 230 (218965)
06-23-2005 12:13 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by Brian
06-23-2005 12:06 PM


Re: Where would it end?
The point is that it is none of your business or the state's business. Anyone who has a decent respect for the idea of liberty as a hard-won principle of Western institutions has to let people be people and stop trying to micromanage what they think, whether about the Old Testament or anything else. You are too sure of your right to impose your oh-so-absolutely-dogmatically-perfectly-right-and-true views on everyone else, just as every tyrant always has been.
This message has been edited by Faith, 06-23-2005 12:17 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Brian, posted 06-23-2005 12:06 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by jar, posted 06-23-2005 12:27 PM Faith has replied
 Message 61 by Brian, posted 06-23-2005 12:32 PM Faith has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 59 of 230 (218969)
06-23-2005 12:27 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by Faith
06-23-2005 12:13 PM


Re: Where would it end?
Once again you are missing the point and falling back on the classic defense that you have some right to believe that 2 + 2 = 5.
There are things that are certainly subject to belief. For example, whether or not there is a GOD and the nature of that GOD is something subject to belief. However there are other things that are factual in nature.
The age of the earth and universe is factual. The earth is billions of years old and the universe is tens of billions of years old. To teach otherwise is to teach that 2 + 2 = 5.
It is willful ignorance.
Evolution is a fact. Mankind is simply a product of a long line of evolutionary changes. To teach otherwise is to teach 2 + 2 = 5.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Faith, posted 06-23-2005 12:13 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by Faith, posted 06-23-2005 12:30 PM jar has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 60 of 230 (218971)
06-23-2005 12:30 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by jar
06-23-2005 12:27 PM


Re: Where would it end?
Oh I get it all right. It's that absolute dogmatic ARROGANT PIGHEADED certainty that evolution is a matter of 2+2=4 that makes you and Brian totalitarians on this issue. If I have to I will defend the right of parents to teach their children that 2+2=5 IF THEY DAMN WELL PLEASE. It is none of your business and none of the state's business to dictate such things.
This message has been edited by Faith, 06-23-2005 12:34 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by jar, posted 06-23-2005 12:27 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by jar, posted 06-23-2005 12:35 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 63 by Brian, posted 06-23-2005 12:36 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024