Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Off Topic Posts aka Rabbit Trail Thread - Mostly YEC Geology
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


(1)
Message 265 of 409 (685574)
12-23-2012 7:18 PM
Reply to: Message 172 by Faith
12-22-2012 12:03 AM


Re: Grand Canyon visible effects flood scenario
Funny, that is not what the geologist, you know, the people who actually went to college and studied the subject say
http://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/education/foos/plateau.pdf

This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by Faith, posted 12-22-2012 12:03 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 266 by Faith, posted 12-23-2012 7:23 PM ramoss has replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


(1)
Message 267 of 409 (685578)
12-23-2012 7:43 PM
Reply to: Message 266 by Faith
12-23-2012 7:23 PM


Re: Grand Canyon visible effects flood scenario
Well, it's sad that you think that going with the literal meaning of Genesis, something that to a large extent, the Jewish faith hasn't done in 2500 years trumps modern science, study and evidence.
And your insistence that is does is 'funny', but not humorous.
This whole 'oh, they are trying to destroy Christianity with their talk about evolution and the age of the earth' paranoia is just pitiful... and the insistence you accept 'true science'.
You reject biology, because biology makes so sense except in the light of evolution.
you reject physics for it's dating methods.
you reject cosmology for the results of IT'S dating methods.
You reject Geology.
I mean, it's 'funny', but so sad really. That method is really giving Christianity a bad reputation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 266 by Faith, posted 12-23-2012 7:23 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 270 by Faith, posted 12-24-2012 2:59 AM ramoss has replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


(8)
Message 287 of 409 (685630)
12-24-2012 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 270 by Faith
12-24-2012 2:59 AM


Re: Science versus Christianity
The literal reading of Genesis is the simple plain reading. I don't see how it can HONESTLY be made to mean anything else.
The "Jewish faith" gets it all wrong so why should that impress me? I argued for years via email with an orthodox Jewish guy, it was interesting and I liked the guy but boy do they believe some strange stuff, most of it exactly what the Pharisees of Jesus' time taught.
From what you complain about, 90% of the Christian faith gets it wrong too. Frankly, you are using the Jewish scriptures, and telling the people whose tradition it has for a lot longer than Christian fundamentalism has existed that they are misinterpreting their own religion. After all, the Jewish scriptures are not good enough for you Christians. You call our stuff OLD , and your stuff NEW . Yet, you go ahead and interpret MY book, the book of the Jewish people. And frankly , you interpret it wrong. It's not your fault, because it's not your book. You don't hear Rabbi's interpreting the New testament, now DO you? (acknowledgment to Lewis Black)
I'll say it again: I'm all in favor of science, real science, the kind you can test, that gives us great technology and all that, I'm objecting to science that is purely speculative, which the old earth sciences are no matter how much screaming you all do about how theory is really fact, , I'm certainly for serious study, I'm not for making it up as you go and calling it fact, and I'm all for evidence which really only exists for real science, and in the sciences of the past the actual evidence actually supports a young earth and the flood just as well or better than it supports the establishment viewpoint. If you'd all get your bias blinders off and just THINK you might see that.
That's the thing, now isn't it. In astronomy, physics, chemistry, geography, and cosmology, it CAN and HAS been tested. It IS in serious study. You just have blinders on, and refuse to learn anything that contradicts your misinterpretation of the bible.
There might be a 'True Christianity' out there, but frankly, you don't follow it. You are following a distorted version that developed in the mid 1800's in the southern US with the rise of the Millerites.. That's not 'True Christianity'. It lost what is important.
I am reminded of Galileo's quote about God and intelligence
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them.
I wish that the fundamentalist Christian would understand it too. The denial of evidence, the refusing to even LOOK at the evidence, and the distortion of the evidence to try to fit into their preconceptions is forgoing the use of reason and intellect.
Understanding how the world works, and understanding that yes, indeed, the world is billions of years old, that evolution does happen, that evidence does show that at one point about 13.7 billion years ago, our universe expanded from a single point does not mean you have to give up your faith.. your belief in God, your belief in Jesus and salvation. Hundreds of millions of Christians have that, without giving up their use of reason, and common sense. Many of these people have deep and abiding faith that lead them do to GOOD in this world. They still don't reject the conclusions of science, and evidence.
I find it odd that there are people so out there that think God is so small and petty he would send people to hell over a wrong belief in science, yet is so big and fantastic he created the universe. That sounds very anthropomorphic to me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 270 by Faith, posted 12-24-2012 2:59 AM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 288 by Stile, posted 12-24-2012 11:50 AM ramoss has not replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


(2)
Message 295 of 409 (685647)
12-24-2012 1:58 PM
Reply to: Message 293 by foreveryoung
12-24-2012 1:40 PM


I would think that an omnicenct being would know how to communicate better. To me, the fact that the bible is so contradictory, and in many respects confusing shows it is the product of human minds, and human society, rather than an omniscient being

This message is a reply to:
 Message 293 by foreveryoung, posted 12-24-2012 1:40 PM foreveryoung has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024