Sorry, I cannot comply. I know that some well paid lawyer wrote that complaint.
I understand that the lawyers did not have much to work with, but surely something other than simply typing a 'Chick tract' into legal form was called for here.
No, not really. Can you, for example, find in it any references to any relevant case law? This well-paid lawyer refers to exactly one case,
McGowan v. Maryland, in the whole darn thing, and it is possible that he didn't bother to read it. You may look yourself at the link and decide its relevance.
So what was the "highly-paid lawyer" being paid
for, if not his knowledge of the law? Well apparently to repeat some standard dumb creationist whining about how science is a religion and so teaching it violates the First Amendment, waaaah! You don't need to be a lawyer to do that, in fact it's positively a handicap.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
™ Version 4.2
(1)