|
Author
|
Topic: What is a 'true Christian'?
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 52 of 141 (726599)
05-10-2014 9:50 AM
|
Reply to: Message 10 by AZPaul3
05-09-2014 1:17 AM
|
|
I think a True Christian is easy to spot.
True Christianity in all of it's Glory!
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 10 by AZPaul3, posted 05-09-2014 1:17 AM | | AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 82 of 141 (726724)
05-11-2014 2:58 PM
|
Reply to: Message 74 by Faith
05-11-2014 3:29 AM
|
|
Re: How much scripture is it safe to disbelieve?
But you know, if the Bible IS the word of God you are taking chances whenever you reject or reinterpret any of it. So if one were to ignore the stipulation to kill those no good queers (Lev 20:13) how much of a chance would you think one is taking on a 1-10 scale and would this be more of a risk than serving a gay bread (that's a gay person some bread, not selling gay bread)? Edited by Larni, : gay bread
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 74 by Faith, posted 05-11-2014 3:29 AM | | Faith has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 117 of 141 (745897)
12-29-2014 6:19 AM
|
Reply to: Message 114 by dwise1
12-28-2014 2:34 PM
|
|
Re: Where Some Of Us Stand
I think this link shows what True Christians(tm) think about atheists.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 114 by dwise1, posted 12-28-2014 2:34 PM | | dwise1 has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 119 of 141 (745904)
12-29-2014 9:31 AM
|
Reply to: Message 118 by Phat
12-29-2014 7:27 AM
|
|
Re: Where Some Of Us Stand
Finally...Larni...there is you...my friend with psychoanalytic experience. I have a question for you. If my brain pattern changes slowly from addiction to recovery (they estimate 6 months before it even starts to reset and change) could some of my beliefs be the result of an unhealthy addictive pattern in my brain? (BTW that Landover Baptist website has some weird humor on it! weird humor Well, I don't know much abut psychoanalysis (apart from the fact it's bollocks) because I do CBT but I don't think one can draw the kinds of causal links you are suggesting. Basically people do things for the results they give. So ask yourself what results come from the things that you do and you should start to see why you do the things that you do. Sorry for the politician's answer, hope you had a good xmas.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 118 by Phat, posted 12-29-2014 7:27 AM | | Phat has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 127 of 141 (745948)
12-30-2014 4:00 AM
|
Reply to: Message 120 by dwise1
12-29-2014 4:22 PM
|
|
Re: Where Some Of Us Stand
I know Landover is satire.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 120 by dwise1, posted 12-29-2014 4:22 PM | | dwise1 has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 128 by Phat, posted 12-30-2014 7:55 AM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 129 of 141 (745950)
12-30-2014 7:59 AM
|
Reply to: Message 128 by Phat
12-30-2014 7:55 AM
|
|
Re: Where Some Of Us Stand
It did fool me, for a bit. I made up an account in righteous fury and then just could not believe it was real and looked it up on the googles and then just enjoyed a very ride.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 128 by Phat, posted 12-30-2014 7:55 AM | | Phat has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 131 by dwise1, posted 12-30-2014 9:49 AM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 132 of 141 (745955)
12-30-2014 9:53 AM
|
Reply to: Message 131 by dwise1
12-30-2014 9:49 AM
|
|
Re: Where Some Of Us Stand
Yeah, once I figured it out I remember being sure some of my post had vanished, wholesale: I got band pretty quick.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 131 by dwise1, posted 12-30-2014 9:49 AM | | dwise1 has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2