Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Search for Moderate Islam
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 59 of 432 (737046)
09-16-2014 8:49 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by Faith
09-16-2014 3:38 AM


decriminalizing abortion in the US was a Christian lead movement.
Or try living in communities that are dominated by atheists. All it took was one loudmouthed atheist to remove prayer from the public schools, which had been in place for centuries; all it took was one plaintiff to make abortion the law of the land.
Faith, in the US it was actually Christians, lots of Christian, mainly Southern Baptists that spearheaded the movement to decriminalize abortion not just one plaintiff.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Faith, posted 09-16-2014 3:38 AM Faith has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 153 of 432 (746445)
01-06-2015 10:18 PM
Reply to: Message 152 by Coyote
01-06-2015 9:55 PM


maybe if we stop over reacting
Maybe if we stopped overreacting and trying to impose our will by force there might be fewer acts of terrorism.
But have there been any acts of Islamic terrorism that were a real threat to the US?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by Coyote, posted 01-06-2015 9:55 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by Coyote, posted 01-06-2015 10:44 PM jar has replied
 Message 160 by Jon, posted 01-07-2015 8:56 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 155 of 432 (746449)
01-06-2015 10:51 PM
Reply to: Message 154 by Coyote
01-06-2015 10:44 PM


Re: maybe if we stop over reacting
I'd call the 9/11 attacks a real threat. The two WTCs, the Pentagon, and the White House. As well as one other which didn't get off the ground.
Do you have some good reason why you'd want to minimize those attacks as not being a real threat?
This I've got to hear!
How utterly sad that you find those a threat to the US.
Even if all had succeeded would they have threatened the continuation of the US?
I have a little more faith in reality. When much of London was destroyed during the Blitz did it threaten the continuation of Great Britain? Is the US so weak and insignificant that the destruction of two buildings and damage to a third threatens its existence?
Certainly it is a tragedy but to claim it was a threat to the US simply makes the US look pathetic.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 154 by Coyote, posted 01-06-2015 10:44 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 156 by Coyote, posted 01-06-2015 11:13 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 157 of 432 (746452)
01-06-2015 11:26 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by Coyote
01-06-2015 11:13 PM


Re: maybe if we stop over reacting
Maybe you're right.
Perhaps we should invite various thugs around the world to do similar attacks on an annual basis. We could even make it a holiday of some sorts. Maybe we could even do a lottery to select who gets to whack us on that day. And the size of the attack could come as a big surprise! We could even celebrate with fireworks or something.
After all, it doesn't threaten our overall continuation, now does it?
LOL
Perhaps that is what you suggest, but I have never made such a stupid suggestion.
But maybe in your wisdom you might be right.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by Coyote, posted 01-06-2015 11:13 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 158 by Coyote, posted 01-06-2015 11:43 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 159 of 432 (746471)
01-07-2015 8:52 AM
Reply to: Message 158 by Coyote
01-06-2015 11:43 PM


Re: maybe if we stop over reacting
What you are suggesting is that we should not react very vigorously to these kinds of attacks.
Sorry but that is just another example of you misrepresenting what I have said.
Now, the method we used after 9/11 was probably not very good. Long, protracted gradual escalation type "actions" are a proven failure.
But perhaps our failure was in under-reacting, not over-reacting.
Maybe some combination of a short-term real "shock and awe" along with very focused use of our special forces to chase after the bad guys would have been more effective. And it would have been a lot less costly.
Shock and awe was utterly stupid in relation to 9-11 and yes, our method of response was not just not very good, it was stupid. A military invasion of Afghanistan did absolutely nothing over the long term except what certainly was obvious even before it started, a long protracted waste of human lives and sorely needed funds. Our invasion of Iraq was totally unrelated to 9-11 and by any reasonable standards immoral as well as another waste of US lives and money.
Maybe some combination of a short-term real "shock and awe" along with very focused use of our special forces to chase after the bad guys would have been more effective. And it would have been a lot less costly.
While shock and awe seems dumb, a focused use of power would have been a very reasonable option.
That extra $ trillion or so could have been used very productively on research and development here at home. It can be argued that we received no good long-term benefits from the way we conducted the post-9/11 actions. Certainly recent events have suggested that to be the case.
Not to mention starting to rebuild the US infrastructure.
So, maybe the solution is more blitzkrieg and less PC in our military activities. Better to be feared and respected than to be liked.
Nonsense. Had we taken one tenth of the money spent on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and used it as foreign aid to promote education, jobs, health care and infrastructure in Palestine and Afghanistan it would have done far more to help keep the US safe.
Few people fear the US, lots hate it.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by Coyote, posted 01-06-2015 11:43 PM Coyote has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 161 of 432 (746474)
01-07-2015 9:27 AM
Reply to: Message 160 by Jon
01-07-2015 8:56 AM


Re: maybe if we stop over reacting
I believe your analysis of public opinion is probably correct. Sad, isn't it.
But the loss of American lives in 9-11 pales when compared to the over 57,000 US casualties in Afghanistan and Iraq. And that also does not include the casualties other than US Military personnel resulting from those actions.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by Jon, posted 01-07-2015 8:56 AM Jon has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 168 of 432 (746557)
01-08-2015 9:48 AM
Reply to: Message 167 by vimesey
01-08-2015 9:37 AM


PC?
What would the PC position be for al Jazeera?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by vimesey, posted 01-08-2015 9:37 AM vimesey has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 170 by vimesey, posted 01-08-2015 9:57 AM jar has not replied
 Message 173 by NoNukes, posted 01-08-2015 12:44 PM jar has seen this message but not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 189 of 432 (746645)
01-08-2015 8:50 PM


Where is the threat?
What we need to understand as citizens of the United States of America is that even radical Islam is no where near as great a threat to US lives, wealth and freedom as is the US Congress, Executive branch and of course the SCOTUS.
9-11 was a tragedy, almost 3000 US lives lost but our government's response to the incident resulted in over 50,000 US casualties so far. The total number of non-US casualties from the US response to 9-11 is well into the hundreds of thousands of individuals.
Yes, the US is threatened but mostly by us, by how we react, by our ignorance and lack of critical thinking skills.
Edited by jar, : appalin spallin
Edited by jar, : or ---> our

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 206 of 432 (746677)
01-09-2015 9:59 AM
Reply to: Message 204 by Faith
01-09-2015 9:40 AM


Still making the same mistake.
Faith writes:
Islam actually teaches that it's good to lie to further the Kalifa or taking over the world for Allah. About a year before 9/11 I happened to read a book that quotes Islamic leaders on their plans to take over the world, I've probably even quoted from it here at one time or another.
There you go again Faith, making the utterly silly mistakes just as you do with Christianity; you pay attention to what some author said Islam asserts just like you listen to the lying apologetics called Pastor or Brother or Bishop in the Christian Cult of Ignorance instead of actually check to see if they really are lying to you.
We can tell that you do not read the Bible or believe what the Bible actually says so I have to ask, have you ever read the Qur'an or like the Bible do you just get your "facts" from the CCoI Snake Oil Salesmen?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 204 by Faith, posted 01-09-2015 9:40 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 209 by Faith, posted 01-09-2015 10:15 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 212 of 432 (746687)
01-09-2015 10:24 AM
Reply to: Message 209 by Faith
01-09-2015 10:15 AM


Re: Still making the same mistake.
Faith writes:
The author quoted Islamic leaders and the official books of Islam. You can check it out for yourself.
But Faith, I have checked it out. I have read the Qur'an.
You can prove almost anything by "quote-mining" whether it is what the CCoI Snake Oil salesmen do with the Bible or with the Qur'an.
And you still did not answer the questions.
Have you eve actually read the Bible?
Are two fowl and seven fowl the same number of fowl?
Have you ever actually read the Qur'an?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by Faith, posted 01-09-2015 10:15 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by Faith, posted 01-09-2015 10:27 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 215 of 432 (746692)
01-09-2015 10:43 AM
Reply to: Message 213 by Faith
01-09-2015 10:27 AM


Re: Still making the same mistake.
Too funny.
You still haven't answered the questions.
Have you eve actually read the Bible?
Are two fowl and seven fowl the same number of fowl?
Have you ever actually read the Qur'an?
It's not a matter of what I think the writings say but rather (just as with the Bible) what is actually written.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by Faith, posted 01-09-2015 10:27 AM Faith has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 222 of 432 (746708)
01-09-2015 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 220 by Faith
01-09-2015 11:15 AM


the Trinity
Faith writes:
Do you guys know what "orejudice" means? It is no more prejudiced to condemn a religion than it is to irrationally support it as you are doing. You guys have the PC prejudice that insists against all reality and truth that all religions are basically the same and deserve to have the same rights. That's a blind and stupd prejudice.
No one has make the claim that all religions are basically the same (but the Trinity of Islam, Judaism and Christianity all are based on worshiping the same God and on the same stories).
BUT it is true, thank Allah, that in the US all religions have the same rights. That is what our Constitution guarantees.
Have you ever read the Constitution Faith?
Edited by jar, : appalin spallin

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 220 by Faith, posted 01-09-2015 11:15 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by Faith, posted 01-09-2015 11:28 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 224 of 432 (746714)
01-09-2015 11:37 AM
Reply to: Message 223 by Faith
01-09-2015 11:28 AM


Re: the Triunity
LOL
Actually they were very familiar with Islam.
But you still have only posted your propaganda and never bothered to answer the questions:
Have you eve actually read the Bible?
Are two fowl and seven fowl the same number of fowl?
Have you ever actually read the Qur'an?
Have you ever read the Constitution Faith?
Faith writes:
There is a mosque in America where Nazi paraphernalia is kept in a back room, signifying their alliance with that mentality, their anti-Semitism and their basic hatred of everything the Constitution stands for. You really think the founders intended to give free rein to an ideology that so utterly contradicts the freedoms they worked so hard to establish?
Even if that were true (and you have offered no evidence that it is true) then you should know that that too is protected and should be protected by our Constitution.
Edited by jar, : fix formatting

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 223 by Faith, posted 01-09-2015 11:28 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 225 by Faith, posted 01-09-2015 11:39 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 226 of 432 (746718)
01-09-2015 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 225 by Faith
01-09-2015 11:39 AM


Re: the Triunity
But you still have only posted your propaganda and never bothered to answer the questions:
Have you eve actually read the Bible?
Are two fowl and seven fowl the same number of fowl?
Have you ever actually read the Qur'an?
Have you ever read the Constitution Faith?
Faith writes:
Yup, the PC leftist interpretation of the Constitution does indeed have it protecting antiConstitutional ideologies, a sure recipe for total implosion of the nation, abolition of the Constitution, abolition of freedom, subjugation of the people.
Is this not what the First Amendment says?
quote:
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Are you saying that the way to maintain freedom is by taking away freedoms?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 225 by Faith, posted 01-09-2015 11:39 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 227 by Faith, posted 01-09-2015 11:49 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 230 of 432 (746723)
01-09-2015 12:00 PM
Reply to: Message 227 by Faith
01-09-2015 11:49 AM


Re: the Trinity
Faith writes:
Absolutely. We curtail the freedoms of criminals and Islam is a criminal ideology.
So you claim but I notice so far you have produced no evidence to support your allegation or show that there is any justification for denying basic rights to an ideology.
But you still have only posted your propaganda and never bothered to answer the questions:
Have you eve actually read the Bible?
Are two fowl and seven fowl the same number of fowl?
Have you ever actually read the Qur'an?
Have you ever read the Constitution Faith?
Faith writes:
Yup, the PC leftist interpretation of the Constitution does indeed have it protecting antiConstitutional ideologies, a sure recipe for total implosion of the nation, abolition of the Constitution, abolition of freedom, subjugation of the people.
Is this not what the First Amendment says?
quote:
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Are you saying that the way to maintain freedom is by taking away freedoms?
When a Muslim commits a crime that Muslim is subject to the same laws in the US as a Christian. But Islam is not an individual and every Muslim has the same rights of freedom of speech and worship as a Biblical Christian.
In the US it seems Nazi sympathizers are far more often Christians than Muslims. Should we also take away the rights of those people?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 227 by Faith, posted 01-09-2015 11:49 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 232 by Faith, posted 01-09-2015 12:09 PM jar has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024