Summations Only

Ah, IOW there are not lots of YECs investigating the fludde from the physical evidence. Glad you cleared that up.

Centuries.

What changes by what processes?

I get 13 including the one to which I'm replying.

IOW you have no idea.

Who plagiarized pretty much everything from George McCready Price (1870-1963) without attribution.Who in turn made pretty much all of his stuff up based on the writings of the founder of the Seventh Day Adventists, Allen G. White (1827-1915).

Yeah, Ellen, that was autocorrect. She was the founder and leader of a small fringe Christian sect.But the fact remains that "modern" YEC dates to the mid nineteenth century. And is still running on the knowledge of the eighteenth century and earlier. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

She didn't even try. She will never learn that insulting an idea is not discussing or refuting it.

But nothing to say to support your disagreement.

Except the many years you have been fighting the minuscule amount of evidence you can acknowledge and making up extra-biblical fantasies that are falsified by that rest of the evidence and are usually physically impossible.

You're confusing evidence and interpretation again.The entire Earth and every detail is evidence.Your quarrel should be with the mainstream interpretation.But you are incapable of comprehending or discussing that interpretation. All you have is kindergarten name calling.

That's gobbledygook. If your latest description (AKA unsupported assertion) doesn't suffice the obvious thing to do is digging up the post where you discussed.Of course, in this case we know there is no discussion to dig up.

You see no need to answer that pack of lies? Let’s discuss.

quote:

---

status quo interpretation has no real evidence and is definitely all in your heads.

You're confusing evidence and interpretation again.

​

The entire Earth and every detail is evidence.

​

Your quarrel should be with the mainstream interpretation.

​

But you are incapable of comprehending or discussing that interpretation. All you have is kindergarten name calling.

---

The first three statements are simple facts.You've just proved the fourth. Again.Got anything substantive to say?Didn't think so.

Your latest post was an unsupported (and false) assertion. If there's nothing more in your previous post, then your previous post was another unsupported (and false) assertion. So you know you haven't discussed human versus chimp body plans. Your claim to have done so is a deliberate lie. Looks as if you did that to avoid revealing your ignorance and inability to support your claims any more than you already have.

Why would the circumstances of its finding and who found it matter?The other items you mention are well known and readily available to anyone interested in truth.