The Big Bang and Absolute Zero

Some problematic factors relative to alleged absolute zero are:1. There was no place/area in which it could have existed.
2. There was no place/area in which it could have expanded into.
3. There was no time in which it could have existed.
4. It satisfies none of the LOTs.Edited by Buzsaw, : as designated in contextEdited by Buzsaw, : fix tech error in first edit

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Then I would assume that the problems I've cited would apply to the extremely hot state, having no place to exist, no outside of and no time in which it could have existed.Is this state called the singularity? If not what would you call it?

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Your phrase does not suggest there is "no place" in which the matter and energy of the Universe could exist implies a place in which the matter and energy of the Universe could exist, does it not? If so, when Universe was T=0 what place/area did it exist in? If you say "no place" then we're back to square one relative to my problem that there was no place for the singularity to have existed.As well, the 1LoT which we observe as a law of of science apparantly did not apply unless the alleged singularity was eternal.What it seems to boil down to is that the singularity and the Big Bang model has as many, if not more unknowns as the Buzsaw ID creationist model.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.